On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:08:29PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:30:05PM -0400, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
> > > No I will next time. I'm also using a Radeon 64DDR on a TBird 900 (VIA
> > > KT-133) if that makes any difference.
> >
> > Hm. I and a few others have been h
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:10:13AM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote:
> >
> > Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > They extend beyond that. VIA KT133A-based Abit KT7A (friend has KT7-RAID
> > > which is KT133 based and has the same problem..) 30 seconds o
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > They extend beyond that. VIA KT133A-based Abit KT7A (friend has KT7-RAID
> > which is KT133 based and has the same problem..) 30 seconds or so after
> > we start any serious 3D app, down goes the entire box.
>
>
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 05:10:56PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > > They extend beyond that. VIA KT133A-based Abit KT7A (friend has KT7-RAID
> > > which is KT133 based and has the same problem..) 30 seconds or so after
> > > we start any seri
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 05:10:56PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > They extend beyond that. VIA KT133A-based Abit KT7A (friend has KT7-RAID
> > which is KT133 based and has the same problem..) 30 seconds or so after
> > we start any serious 3D app, down goes the entire box.
>
> FTR, I'v
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:30:05PM -0400, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
> > > No I will next time. I'm also using a Radeon 64DDR on a TBird 900 (VIA
> > > KT-133) if that makes any difference.
> >
> > Hm. I and a few others have been having problems with
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:30:05PM -0400, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
> > No I will next time. I'm also using a Radeon 64DDR on a TBird 900 (VIA
> > KT-133) if that makes any difference.
>
> Hm. I and a few others have been having problems with the 64DDR,
> although much more extreme than yours.
On 07 Jun 2001 17:26:07 -0600, zifnab wrote:
> No I will next time. I'm also using a Radeon 64DDR on a TBird 900 (VIA
> KT-133) if that makes any difference.
Hm. I and a few others have been having problems with the 64DDR,
although much more extreme than yours. It seems that the problems are
AM
> From: zifnab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am running CVS from Tuesday and I was playing Tribes 2 with no problem.
> Then I came back a few hours later and started it up again. It took quite
> a while to start up (at first I thought X had crashed but then Tribes
> finally started). When I started
I am running CVS from Tuesday and I was playing Tribes 2 with no problem.
Then I came back a few hours later and started it up again. It took quite
a while to start up (at first I thought X had crashed but then Tribes
finally started). When I started to play it was painfully slow when it
needed
zifnab wrote:
>
> I am running CVS from Tuesday and I was playing Tribes 2 with no problem.
> Then I came back a few hours later and started it up again. It took quite
> a while to start up (at first I thought X had crashed but then Tribes
> finally started). When I started to play it was painf
No I will next time. I'm also using a Radeon 64DDR on a TBird 900 (VIA
KT-133) if that makes any difference.
Glen
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Brian Paul wrote:
> zifnab wrote:
> >
> > I am running CVS from Tuesday and I was playing Tribes 2 with no problem.
> > Then I came back a few hours lat
Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>
> > Scott Billings wrote:
> >>
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and when I
> >> run glxinfo I get the string:
> >>
> >> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86
> Scott Billings wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and when I
>> run glxinfo I get the string:
>>
>> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86/MMX/3DNow!
>>
>> What is curious to me, is
The date doesn't relate to the date of the snapshot or build, but the date
of the last major modification to the code, IIRC.
Adam
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Scott Billings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and wh
Scott Billings wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and when I
> run glxinfo I get the string:
>
> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86/MMX/3DNow!
>
> What is curious to me, is the date
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just donwloded the latest DRI driver for the Radeon on x86, and when I
run glxinfo I get the string:
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 1x x86/MMX/3DNow!
What is curious to me, is the date. The package I got was labled as a
snap
17 matches
Mail list logo
