Quoting Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are two parts to this. There is the assembly coded parts of Mesa
> (for 3Dnow & SSE) and there are compile switches for GCC. For example, we may
> wish to see if there are any benefits to building a version with
> '-mcpu=i686' or '-mcpu=k6' or
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:47:07AM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > anyone is interested in athlon-compiled binary drivers, I can help (but
> > not
> > before march 4th).
>
> I think that there is no reason for not enabling every optimization in
> Mes
On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
>
> Some good news, just when I'm away from school! (and its great connection
> :) ).
> But just a thought: it looks like you use the "standard" host.def for the
>
> mach64 build. And the last time I checked out the branch, the #define
> MesaUse
Quoting Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
> Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
> f
