Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-devel][PATCH] Segfault in DRI Xserver extension

2002-12-15 Thread Jens Owen
Felix, Thanks for finding and fixing this vulnerability in the DRI extension. I'm copying the xpert list on this fix, because it looks like their may be other extensions with the same vulnerability. For example: xc/programs/Xserver/Xext/panoramiX.c: line 991 Felix Kühling wrote: On Thu, 12

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-devel][PATCH] Segfault in DRI Xserver extension

2002-12-13 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:58:35 + Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix Kühling wrote: > > > > One more thing, do you think I should submit my patch to XFree86 as > > well? Could be a good oportunity to become a member there and get access > > to NDA docs. Are radeon specs available

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-devel][PATCH] Segfault in DRI Xserver extension

2002-12-13 Thread Keith Whitwell
Felix Kühling wrote: On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:26:23 + Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Felix Kühling wrote: Hi, while I was messing around with my query programme I found this: if I specify an invalid screen as argument to XF86DRIGetClientDriverName the Xserver segfaults. I had a

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-devel][PATCH] Segfault in DRI Xserver extension

2002-12-13 Thread Felix Kühling
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:26:23 + Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix Kühling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while I was messing around with my query programme I found this: if I > > specify an invalid screen as argument to XF86DRIGetClientDriverName the > > Xserver segfaults. I had a quic