On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 14:45, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:47:36 -0800
> Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > >>manu wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Responding to myself : sorry it seems tha
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:47:36 -0800
Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>manu wrote:
> >>
> >>>Responding to myself : sorry it seems that the problem is because the
> >>>r200_dri.so module is linked a
I was pretty sure that the snapshots did staticly link with libexpat.a.
I remember there being some discussion about this. Once XFree86 4.4.0
hits the streets this particular problem will be moot. AFAIK, XFree86
4.4.0 will include libexpat. However, I still think that the default
should be
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
manu wrote:
Responding to myself : sorry it seems that the problem is because the
r200_dri.so module is linked against libexpat.so.1 which is not on my
system. So I just made a link to the one I had and all is
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> manu wrote:
>
> >Le 30.10.2003 17:07:54, manu a écrit :
> >
> >>So I ran glxinfo see below which told me that Direct Rendering is not
> >>enabled! This is crazy as you can check in the XFree log (file
> >>attached).
> >>Hope someo
manu wrote:
Le 30.10.2003 17:07:54, manu a écrit :
So I ran glxinfo see below which told me that Direct Rendering is not
enabled! This is crazy as you can check in the XFree log (file
attached).
Hope someone can tell me more about this, be it to file this directly
as a bug on bugzilla ;-)
T
