[Dri-devel] Re: Re: Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-03 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, I'm not sure freedesktop.org can host anoncvs, though it's possible we could for DRI. I know GNOME, KDE, Mozilla, and other huge projects' anoncvs would require more load than freedesktop.org server can handle. DRI anoncvs traffic may be smaller. However, we do plan to have anoncvs mirrors

[Dri-devel] Re: Re: Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-02 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: What is wrong right now is that we can't get uptodate versions of the repository to non-developers. Non-developers currently don't have BK, arch, subversion or even cvsup installed. They do seem to often have CVS installed, and we've successfully

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Re: Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-02 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:42, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: What is wrong right now is that we can't get uptodate versions of the repository to non-developers. Non-developers currently don't have BK, arch, subversion or even cvsup installed. They do