Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even
think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need
such a thing..
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> >>Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
>> >>anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even
>> >>think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need
>> >>such a thing..
>>
>
> On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel D=C3=A4nzer wrote:
> > I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
>
> If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd=20
> anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
> but that needs to happen soon anywa
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd
anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
but that needs to happen soon anyway
-
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd
anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
but that needs to happen soon anyway
-
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> >>Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
> >>anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even
think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will eve
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
> anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even
> think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need
> such a thi
> > > dri.freedesktop.org sound good?
> >
> > I love the idea of moving to freedesktop.org right now to deal with the
> > anonymous cvs issue, provide cvsup, and probably a more responsive set
> > of admins. Is there consensus on this?
>
> I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:53, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:42, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >
> > dri.freedesktop.org sound good?
>
> I love the idea of moving to freedesktop.org right now to deal with the
> anonymous cvs issue, provide cvsup, and probably a more responsive set
> of ad
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:17, Jon Smirl wrote:
--- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:37, Jon Smirl wrote:
The BitKeeper people have said they would love to be the host for DRI/Mesa
source.
I strongly object to this, I won't take part in developm
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly, so why are you trying to sneak in a non-free tool instead of
> addressing the real problem?
It's not a very stealthy sneak. I have been using both for a year and BK is
simply much better than CVS. I also admit, I use Redhat not Debian; I am n
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:17, Jon Smirl wrote:
> --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:37, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > The BitKeeper people have said they would love to be the host for DRI/Mesa
> > > source.
> >
> > I strongly object to this, I won't take part in devel
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:37, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > The BitKeeper people have said they would love to be the host for DRI/Mesa
> > source.
>
> I strongly object to this, I won't take part in development with
> non-free tools. If CVS really is a problem,
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2003 22:22 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:37, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > The BitKeeper people have said they would love to be the host for
> > DRI/Mesa source.
>
> I strongly object to this, I won't take part in development with
> non-free tools.
I second tha
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:37, Jon Smirl wrote:
> The BitKeeper people have said they would love to be the host for DRI/Mesa
> source.
I strongly object to this, I won't take part in development with
non-free tools. If CVS really is a problem, there are free alternatives
which should be more than po
16 matches
Mail list logo
