Re: [Dri-devel] Re: mach64 drm work

2002-06-02 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.06.01 23:49 Leif Delgass wrote: > ... > > I found and fixed this problem (I was using ring.tail to set the offset > for buffer "aging" before it was incremented). > > ... > > I've cleaned this up a bit and done the work in COMMIT_RING. > > ... > > OK, I'm still not sure if I have this

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: mach64 drm work

2002-06-01 Thread Leif Delgass
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Leif Delgass wrote: > the ring_wait is really not necessary, since 128 16kB buffers can use a > max of 512 of the 1024 descriptors. We'd need 4MB of buffers to fill > the ring. On second thought, this is only true as long as we're not reusing buffers. If we reuse buffers f

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: mach64 drm work

2002-06-01 Thread Leif Delgass
On Fri, 31 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote: > On 2002.05.31 02:53 Leif Delgass wrote: > > On Thu, 30 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote: > > > > I've fixed one bug already that was related to the ring tail being left > > pre-incremented (the table_end I had before wasn't). Some of my problems > > were r

[Dri-devel] Re: mach64 drm work

2002-05-31 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.05.31 02:53 Leif Delgass wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote: > > > Leif, > > > > On 2002.05.30 02:02 José Fonseca wrote: > > > ... Tomorrow I'll take a look more carefully to see if I find > anything > > > suspicious. ... > > > > I've been analyzing the diff very carefully a

[Dri-devel] Re: mach64 drm work

2002-05-30 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 30 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote: > Leif, > > On 2002.05.30 02:02 José Fonseca wrote: > > ... Tomorrow I'll take a look more carefully to see if I find anything > > suspicious. ... > > I've been analyzing the diff very carefully and what I've found so far are > just some details which

[Dri-devel] Re: mach64 drm work

2002-05-30 Thread José Fonseca
Leif, On 2002.05.30 02:02 José Fonseca wrote: > ... Tomorrow I'll take a look more carefully to see if I find anything > suspicious. ... I've been analyzing the diff very carefully and what I've found so far are just some details which can be taken care later (i.e., no bugs sorry) : - This co

[Dri-devel] Re: mach64 drm work

2002-05-29 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.05.30 01:13 Leif Delgass wrote: > Jose, > > It's taking me a little longer than expected to finish the changes I > mentioned. I'm trying to set this up so that it will be possible to test > emitting buffers to the ring as they come in, but keep the original code > in place, while sharing