Re: [Dri-devel] Re: radeon cvs problem (ahg@eng.cam.ac.uk) - binary packages

2002-06-24 Thread José Fonseca
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 09:50:32AM -0700, Smitty wrote: > > ... > >On a side note: >radeon_dri.so is 5.2MB in the SF d/l and >radeon_dri.so is 1.8MB in the TG d/l. >Any explanation? > Debugging info I suppose. The ones in SF have it. José Fonseca --

[Dri-devel] Re: radeon cvs problem (ahg@eng.cam.ac.uk) - binary packages

2002-06-23 Thread Smitty
> Just upgraded to the latest radeon dri-cvs (using the binary packages > on SF) and now the X server won't start. This used to work fine with > the 20 May TCL snapshot. > > The kernel module seems to load OK: > > Jun 19 16:30:36 localhost kernel: [drm] AGP 0.99 on Unknown @ 0xec00 64MB > J

[Dri-devel] Re: radeon cvs problem

2002-06-22 Thread Konstantin Lepikhov
Hi Michel! Saturday 22, at 02:48:06 PM you wrote: > > I was wondering how I managed to break it this time. :) But it works > fine on the Athlon box at work. > > If you're running XFree86 4.1, Keith mentioned that the TCL stuff > doesn't work with that. The TCL snapshots from TG contained a ha