Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 20:45, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > > > >>Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > > >> > > >>>My current diff is at: > > >

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-03 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > >>Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > >> > >>>My current diff is at: > >>>http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > >>>

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-02 Thread Ian Romanick
Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:22, Ian Romanick wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: * Not sure if the fogging in fire is correct -- it looks like I would expect it to, but it disagrees with software rendering. That is common. The sw path does per-pixel fog calculations and the hw

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Whitwell
Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or without sisfb. I h

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-01 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > > My current diff is at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > > > > It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or > > without sisfb. I

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-31 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > My current diff is at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > > It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or > without sisfb. I haven't tested the linux-without-sisfb case, though. > > My progress so

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-30 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:22, Ian Romanick wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > My current diff is at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > > Since building the SiS driver is disabled, I don't see any reason to not > commit your changes. This will allow more adventureous pe

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-30 Thread Ian Romanick
Eric Anholt wrote: My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff Since building the SiS driver is disabled, I don't see any reason to not commit your changes. This will allow more adventureous people to start testing. :) It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine

[Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-29 Thread Eric Anholt
My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or without sisfb. I haven't tested the linux-without-sisfb case, though. My progress so far: * glxgears, geartrain, tunnel, ipers, fire, multiarb,