Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> The big issue being backwards
> compatability. We need to not only provide it in the DRI drivers, but we
> need to (try to) provide it in applications that use libGL.so.
Absolutely, and we don't the advantage of having someone like Linus
point this out to us, instead we'
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:49:34PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> > Brian Paul wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you should try out this change before I commit it to the DRI.
> >
> > Try editing build/xc/lib/GL/GL/Makefile, look for the line that has the
> > string "-Wl,-soname" and repl
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:49:34PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
>
> Perhaps you should try out this change before I commit it to the DRI.
>
> Try editing build/xc/lib/GL/GL/Makefile, look for the line that has the
> string "-Wl,-soname" and replace it with "-Wl,-Bsymbolic,-soname
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:49:20AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:31:46AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Ian Romanick wrote:
> > > > What ends up happening is glXGetProcAddress returns the address of the
> > > > glBegin symbol from my exe
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:49:20AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > Well, you're doing something you're not supposed to do & as a result
> > glXGetProcAddress isn't working right.
> >
> > Do you really need to call your symbol glBegin? How about xyzBegin or
> > similar
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:49:20AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > Well, you're doing something you're not supposed to do & as a result
> > glXGetProcAddress isn't working right.
> >
> > Do you really need to call your symbol glBegin? How about xyzBegin or
> > similar
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:49:20AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Well, you're doing something you're not supposed to do & as a result
> glXGetProcAddress isn't working right.
>
> Do you really need to call your symbol glBegin? How about xyzBegin or
> similar?
I have managed to solve this prob
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:31:46AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Ian Romanick wrote:
> > > What ends up happening is glXGetProcAddress returns the address of the
> > > glBegin symbol from my executable (in this case the address of the pointer
> > > to function) instead
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:31:46AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> > What ends up happening is glXGetProcAddress returns the address of the
> > glBegin symbol from my executable (in this case the address of the pointer
> > to function) instead of the address of the glBegin sym
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> I may be totally misunderstanding glXGetProcAddress, but it seems to me that
> the following *should* be valid:
>
> void (*glBegin)( GLenum mode ) = NULL;
>
> void begin_wrapper( GLenum mode )
> {
> if ( glBegin == NULL )
> {
> glBegin = glXGetProcAddress
I may be totally misunderstanding glXGetProcAddress, but it seems to me that
the following *should* be valid:
void (*glBegin)( GLenum mode ) = NULL;
void begin_wrapper( GLenum mode )
{
if ( glBegin == NULL )
{
glBegin = glXGetProcAddress( "glBegin" );
}
(*glBegin)( m
11 matches
Mail list logo
