On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 18:43, Jos Fonseca wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:02:17PM -0500, Christopher Gleba wrote:
It turns out that I mis-configured lilo and when I rebooted a kernel
with the software suspend patch was being booted rather then a clean one
as I had thought (and I
Chris,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:02:17PM -0500, Christopher Gleba wrote:
Hello Jose,
It's very strange that this doesn't work. If you compile the driver
and the Xserver into /usr/X11R6-DRI/ and use that XFree86 server there
shouln't be any binary incompatabilities problems (which I
-devel] mach64-0-0-6-branch dri bug report
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:02:17 -0500
Hello Jose,
It's very strange that this doesn't work. If you compile the driver
and the Xserver into /usr/X11R6-DRI/ and use that XFree86 server there
shouln't be any binary incompatabilities problems (which I
Christopher,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 02:57:50PM -0500, Christopher Gleba wrote:
Hello Jose,
Thank you for the response.
Do you have a PCI card? If not make sure the agpgart kernel module is
loaded before the mach64 module, by adding
pre-install mach64 modprobe -k agpgart
just a few words for the future, nothing serious...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Gleba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 23:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] mach64-0-0-6-branch dri bug report
Size: 220 kB
i
Christopher,
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:46:55AM -0500, Christopher Gleba wrote:
Hello,
I had been using the mach64-0-0-5-branch in
linux for a while but recently I upgraded my
install and thus gave a shot at the
mach64-0-0-6-branch and encountered a problem.
This report is broken
Hello Jose,
Thank you for the response.
Do you have a PCI card? If not make sure the agpgart kernel module is
loaded before the mach64 module, by adding
pre-install mach64 modprobe -k agpgart
Yes, it is an AGP card:
lspci -vv:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc
Forgot the attachment in the last post.
-Forwarded Message-
From: Christopher Gleba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] mach64-0-0-6-branch dri bug report
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:57:50 -0500
Hello Jose,
Thank you
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:11, Leif Delgass wrote:
I've opened a new mach64 branch (mach64-0-0-6-branch), which has now been
updated from the current DRI trunk with X 4.2.99.2 and Mesa 5.x. I've
updated the mach64 driver to Mesa 5 based on the changes to the Rage 128
driver. Testing hasn't
On 15 Feb 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:11, Leif Delgass wrote:
I've opened a new mach64 branch (mach64-0-0-6-branch), which has now been
updated from the current DRI trunk with X 4.2.99.2 and Mesa 5.x. I've
updated the mach64 driver to Mesa 5 based on the changes to
Leif Delgass wrote:
I've opened a new mach64 branch (mach64-0-0-6-branch), which has now been
updated from the current DRI trunk with X 4.2.99.2 and Mesa 5.x. I've
updated the mach64 driver to Mesa 5 based on the changes to the Rage 128
driver. Testing hasn't shown any problems so far.
I
[...] Since the GATOS head is now based
on current XFree86 cvs, I may not have a new patch until 4.3.0 is released
and changes get propagated back to the DRI and GATOS trees.
Could anyone tell me if I'll find recent GATOS stuff merged into the current
XFree86-4.3 pre-releases ? I did not find
I've opened a new mach64 branch (mach64-0-0-6-branch), which has now been
updated from the current DRI trunk with X 4.2.99.2 and Mesa 5.x. I've
updated the mach64 driver to Mesa 5 based on the changes to the Rage 128
driver. Testing hasn't shown any problems so far.
I haven't adapted the mach64
13 matches
Mail list logo
