Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] DRI newmesa merge

2003-12-11 Thread Brian Paul
Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 10:29, Brian Paul wrote: Alan Hourihane wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:58:44AM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote: --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] I think SourceForge has fixed the CVS problems of times gone by. If SF's CVS causes problems, I'm O

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] DRI newmesa merge

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 10:29, Brian Paul wrote: > Alan Hourihane wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:58:44AM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > >>--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>So Mesa/newtree is going to be the master copy of the dri drivers, including the > >>ones in mesa/dri

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] DRI newmesa merge

2003-12-09 Thread Keith Whitwell
Jon Smirl wrote: Did the DRM device drivers get moved too? They generally have to be changed in tandem with the 3D drivers. Not yet. Let's just get what we've done working & tested. The DRM drivers have a proper, versioned interface to the driver, so a lot of the arguments about co-evolution are

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] DRI newmesa merge

2003-12-09 Thread Brian Paul
Alan Hourihane wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:58:44AM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote: --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So Mesa/newtree is going to be the master copy of the dri drivers, including the ones in mesa/dri/drivers? I'm all for that after doing the merge a couple of times. Yes