Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:39:17 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:29:53 -0400 > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > On Monday 06 April 2009 12:52:16 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 > > > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > There are a number of small form factor de

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On 04/06/2009 08:50 PM, Wang, Zhenyu Z wrote: > On 2009.04.07 00:52:16 +0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 >> Jarod Wilson wrote: >> >>> There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel >>> mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On Monday 06 April 2009 12:52:16 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > > mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel > > mode-setting, this becomes a proble

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On 2009.04.07 00:52:16 +0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > > mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel > > mode-setting, this becomes a problem,

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:29:53 -0400 Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Monday 06 April 2009 12:52:16 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 > > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > > > mobile graphics chips that lie and say th

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 Jarod Wilson wrote: > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel > mode-setting, this becomes a problem, and makes native resolution > boot go haywire -- for example,

[PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel mode-setting, this becomes a problem, and makes native resolution boot go haywire -- for example, my Dell Studio Hybrid, hooked to a 1920x1080 display claims to h