Re: [PATCH] libdrm merge of KMS bits

2008-12-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Saturday, December 13, 2008 6:17 am Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0800 > > Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Initially I thought the merge of the KMS bits into libdrm would be as > > easy as merging the modesetting-gem branch into master. But that branch > > has a ton of stuff i

Re: [PATCH] libdrm merge of KMS bits

2008-12-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > static void > > +dri_gem_bo_reference_locked(dri_bo *bo) > > +{ > > +drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem = (drm_intel_bo_gem *)bo; > > + > > +bo_gem->refcount++; > > +} > > + > > +static void > > drm_intel_gem_bo_reference_locked(drm_intel_bo *bo) > > { > > drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem = (drm_

Re: [PATCH] libdrm merge of KMS bits

2008-12-13 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > Initially I thought the merge of the KMS bits into libdrm would be as easy as > merging the modesetting-gem branch into master. But that branch has a ton of > stuff in it, including code for radeon and nv that its maintainers probably > d

Re: [PATCH] libdrm merge of KMS bits

2008-12-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 15:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Initially I thought the merge of the KMS bits into libdrm would be as easy as > merging the modesetting-gem branch into master. But that branch has a ton of > stuff in it, including code for radeon and nv that its maintainers probably > don