Re: [RFC] dri2-sarea

2009-08-28 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:33:49AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: [...] gears sometimes _is_ a good benchmark. Be careful -- someone might quote you out of context ;-) -antrik- -- Let Crystal Reports handle the

Re: [RFC] dri2-sarea

2009-08-24 Thread Thomas Hellström
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:17 +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: 1) On some systems, X roundtrips are very costly. For example on via processors when running gears, X ends up at around 10% for just the reportdamage call of dri1. Does this affect real apps with

Re: [RFC] dri2-sarea

2009-08-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:17 +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: 1) On some systems, X roundtrips are very costly. For example on via processors when running gears, X ends up at around 10% for just the reportdamage call of dri1. Does this affect real apps with sane framerates? With current

[RFC] dri2-sarea

2009-08-20 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi! I wanted to get some comments about an idea to use dri2 that might improve some drawbacks on dri2 compared to dri1. What's motivating this is the following: 1) On some systems, X roundtrips are very costly. For example on via processors when running gears, X ends up at around 10% for just