On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 16:37, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:38:03 -0400
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Unless there's some objection I'm going to subscribe everyone to the
Unless there's some objection I'm going to subscribe everyone to the
new FD.O-based mesa-dev mailing list who's on the mesa3d-dev list.
Probably in the next 24 hours.
Then, some of you may have to log into the mailman interface
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev) to set
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Unless there's some objection I'm going to subscribe everyone to the
new FD.O-based mesa-dev mailing list who's on the mesa3d-dev list.
Probably in the next 24 hours.
Then, some of you may have to log into the mailman
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:38:03 -0400
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Unless there's some objection I'm going to subscribe everyone to the
new FD.O-based mesa-dev mailing list who's on the mesa3d-dev list.
Probably
Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:20:46 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:16:45 +0100
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:09 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:20:46 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:16:45 +0100
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:09 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to
On Die, 2010-03-23 at 12:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:20:46 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:16:45 +0100
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:09 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Jesse Barnes
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and that
leaves aside sf.net's horrible mail archive interface and poor
performance.
If
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:37:23PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists,
Err, how would moving the
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:19:13 +0100
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:37:23PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:19:13 +0100
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:37:23PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and that
leaves aside sf.net's horrible mail archive interface and poor
performance.
If spam is an
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and that
leaves
Moving seems like a good idea. The delays here have been very troubling.
--
Mike Stroyan - Software Architect
LunarG, Inc. - The Graphics Experts
Cell: (970) 219-7905
Email: m...@lunarg.com
Website: http://www.lunarg.com
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
Yes please!
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:37:23 -0800, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and that
leaves
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:37:23 -0800, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:55:29 -0800
Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:37:23 -0800, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and that
leaves aside sf.net's horrible mail archive interface and poor
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:09 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and that
leaves
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:16:45 +0100
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:09 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 15:09, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists, and that
22 matches
Mail list logo
