Re: [git pull] drm fixes for v4.12-rc1

2017-05-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > It also has an amdgpu fixes pull, with lots of ongoing work on Vega10 > which is new in this kernel and is preliminary support so may have a > fair bit of movement. Note: I will *not* be taking these kinds of pull requests after rc1. If Ve

Re: drm/exynos: g2d userptr memory corruption

2015-08-17 Thread Lucas Stach
Hi Tobias, Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2015, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Tobias Jakobi: > Hello, > > some time ago I checked whether I could use the userptr functionality to > do zero-copy from userspace allocated buffers via the G2D. This didn't > work out so well, so kinda put this to the bottom of my TODO l

Re: drm/exynos: g2d userptr memory corruption

2015-08-17 Thread Tobias Jakobi
Thanks Lucas for the explanation! Lucas Stach wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2015, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Tobias Jakobi: >> Hello, >> >> some time ago I checked whether I could use the userptr functionality to >> do zero-copy from userspace allocated buffers via the G2D. This didn't

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-25 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2015-01-29 14:11:25, Dave Airlie wrote: > These two copy to/from VGA memory, however on the Silicon > Motion SMI750 VGA card on a 64-bit system cause console corruption. > > This is due to the hw being buggy and not handling a 64-bit transaction > correctly. > > We could try and create a 3

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-09 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:00:55 + Daniel Stone wrote: > On 9 February 2015 at 10:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: > >> On 5 February 2015 at 11:35, One Thousand Gnomes > >> wrote: > >>> #if defined (CONFIG_SUPPORT_SHITE_VGA_ADAPTERS) > >>>

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-09 Thread Daniel Stone
On 5 February 2015 at 11:35, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: >> If I'm not mistaken, that would be as simple as adding >> >> #define VT_BUF_HAVE_RW. >> #define scr_writew(val, addr) (*(addr) = (val)) >> #define scr_readw(addr) (*(addr)) >> >> to arch/x86/include/asm/vga.h. > > and stick an

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-09 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 5 February 2015 at 11:35, One Thousand Gnomes > wrote: >>> If I'm not mistaken, that would be as simple as adding >>> >>> #define VT_BUF_HAVE_RW. >>> #define scr_writew(val, addr) (*(addr) = (val)) >>> #define scr_readw(addr) (

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-09 Thread Daniel Stone
On 9 February 2015 at 10:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On 5 February 2015 at 11:35, One Thousand Gnomes >> wrote: >>> #if defined (CONFIG_SUPPORT_SHITE_VGA_ADAPTERS) >>> >>> #endif >>> >>> around that and its sorted as an option everyone

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:54 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:40:33 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> > >> > Linus, this came up a while back I finally got some confirmation >> > that it fixes those servers. >> >> I'm

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-05 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
> If I'm not mistaken, that would be as simple as adding > > #define VT_BUF_HAVE_RW. > #define scr_writew(val, addr) (*(addr) = (val)) > #define scr_readw(addr) (*(addr)) > > to arch/x86/include/asm/vga.h. and stick an #if defined (CONFIG_SUPPORT_SHITE_VGA_ADAPTERS) #endif around

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-02-03 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:40:33 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Linus, this came up a while back I finally got some confirmation > > that it fixes those servers. > > I'm certainly ok with this. which way should it go in? The users are: > >

Re: Can't gmake libdrm-2.4.59 on OmniOS

2015-02-03 Thread Emil Velikov
On 1 February 2015 at 01:03, CodeSwim OS Development wrote: > I'm trying to build libdrm and have an issue when I gmake after > configuring. Steps to reproduce: > > # uname -a > SunOS omnios 5.11 omnios-10b9c79 i86pc i386 i86pc > Where can one get a copy of OmniOS ? Free of charge of course :-P B

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-01-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:40:33PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Linus, this came up a while back I finally got some confirmation > > that it fixes those servers. > > I'm certainly ok with this. which way should it go in? The users are:

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-01-29 Thread Peter Hurley
On 01/28/2015 11:11 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > These two copy to/from VGA memory, however on the Silicon > Motion SMI750 VGA card on a 64-bit system cause console corruption. > > This is due to the hw being buggy and not handling a 64-bit transaction > correctly. > > We could try and create a 32-bi

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-01-29 Thread Dave Airlie
On 30 January 2015 at 10:03, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> >> I can take this through the tty tree, but can I put it in linux-next and >> wait for the 3.20 merge window to give people who might notice a >> slow-down a chance to object? > >

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-01-29 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I can take this through the tty tree, but can I put it in linux-next and > wait for the 3.20 merge window to give people who might notice a > slow-down a chance to object? Yes. The problem only affects one (or a couple of) truly outra

Re: [PATCH] vt_buffer: drop console buffer copying optimisations

2015-01-29 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Linus, this came up a while back I finally got some confirmation > that it fixes those servers. I'm certainly ok with this. which way should it go in? The users are: - drivers/tty/vt/vt.c (Greg KH, "tty layer") - drivers/video/console/*

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/vmwgfx: Use the linux DMA api to get valid device addresses of pages

2013-11-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:39AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > The code handles three different cases: > 1) physical page addresses. The ttm page array is used. > 2) DMA subsystem addresses. A scatter-gather list is used. > 3) Coherent pages. The ttm dma pool is used, together with the dma_ttm

Re: [PATCH 2/6] dri/intel: Split out DRI2 buffer update code to separate function

2013-11-05 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:13:12PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > Make an easy place to splice in a DRI3 version of this function > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_context.c | 90 > +-- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make the vmwgfx driver reasonably DMA-API compliant

2013-11-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:37AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > These patches makes the vmwgfx driver use the DMA API to obtain valid > device addresses rather than blindly using physical addresses. > > The main motivation is to be able to use a virtual IOMMU in the future. Ooooh. Neat! Are t

Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers/dri/common: A few dri2 functions are not actually DRI2 specific

2013-11-05 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:13:11PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > This just renames them so that they can be used with the DRI3 extension > without causing too much confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/dri_util.c | 50 > +

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/ttm: Enable the dma page pool also for intel IOMMUs

2013-11-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:38AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Used by the vmwgfx driver That looks OK to me. And baremetal should not be affected as the Intel VT-d driver turns of the SWIOTLB driver - so it will still use the classic ttm pool code. Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > >

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [PATCH 3/6] dri/intel: Add explicit size parameter to intel_region_alloc_for_fd

2013-11-04 Thread Ian Romanick
On 10/31/2013 04:13 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > Instead of assuming that the size will be height * pitch, have the caller pass > in the size explicitly. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard One nit below. With that changed, Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_region

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/vmwgfx: Use the linux DMA api to get valid device addresses of pages

2013-11-04 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/04/2013 05:40 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:39AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: >> The code handles three different cases: >> 1) physical page addresses. The ttm page array is used. >> 2) DMA subsystem addresses. A scatter-gather list is used. >> 3) Coherent

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/ttm: Enable the dma page pool also for intel IOMMUs

2013-11-04 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/04/2013 05:34 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:38AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: >> Used by the vmwgfx driver > That looks OK to me. And baremetal should not be > affected as the Intel VT-d driver turns of the SWIOTLB > driver - so it will still use the class

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make the vmwgfx driver reasonably DMA-API compliant

2013-11-04 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/04/2013 05:30 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:37AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: >> These patches makes the vmwgfx driver use the DMA API to obtain valid >> device addresses rather than blindly using physical addresses. >> >> The main motivation is to be able

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/vmwgfx: Use the linux DMA api to get valid device addresses of pages

2013-11-04 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/04/2013 05:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:39AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: >> The code handles three different cases: >> 1) physical page addresses. The ttm page array is used. >> 2) DMA subsystem addresses. A scatter-gather list is used. >> 3) Coherent pages.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/vmwgfx: Use the linux DMA api to get valid device addresses of pages

2013-11-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:57:39AM -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > The code handles three different cases: > 1) physical page addresses. The ttm page array is used. > 2) DMA subsystem addresses. A scatter-gather list is used. > 3) Coherent pages. The ttm dma pool is used, together with the dma_ttm

Re: Quick question on DCE8 (HD7770?)

2013-08-01 Thread Rafał Miłecki
2013/8/1 Sérgio Basto : > Hi, DRI devel mailing list have been move to > dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org you may want post your question there . Thanks, I already did: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-July/042583.html -- Rafał

Re: Quick question on DCE8 (HD7770?)

2013-08-01 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qua, 2013-07-31 at 08:25 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > HI guys, > > I'm looking for the cheapest DCE8 GPU. I know there are 3 > (engineering) families using DCE8: KAVERI, BONAIRE and KABINI. > > The only GPU I know should be DCE8 is HD7790 (not even sure which > engineering family is that). U

Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix locking harder

2013-01-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Okay so Alan's patch handled the case where there was no registered fbcon, > however the other path entered in set_con2fb_map pit. > > In there we called fbcon_takeover, but we also took the console lock in a > couple > of places. So push the

Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix locking harder

2013-01-25 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Okay so Alan's patch handled the case where there was no registered fbcon, > however the other path entered in set_con2fb_map pit. > > In there we called fbcon_takeover, but we also took the console lock in a > couple > of places. So push the

Re: drm i915 hangs on heavy io load

2012-10-22 Thread Dave Airlie
> > (please Cc) > > I am running 3.7-rc2 and got recently hit a few times (under rc1, too) > by hanging drm i915 while doing large io operations. Does booting with i915.i915_enable_rc6=0 help? (Daniel, looks like an ironlake). Dave. --

Re: drm: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2012-09-11 Thread Jordan Justen
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Son, 2012-09-09 at 15:33 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: >> New branch 'debian-experimental' available with the following commits: > > I think you pushed this to the wrong repository? My apologies. I had the hook script mis-configured under m

Re: drm: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2012-09-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2012-09-09 at 15:33 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: > New branch 'debian-experimental' available with the following commits: I think you pushed this to the wrong repository? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast |

Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix race condition between console lock and cursor timer

2012-08-21 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >> So after much tracing with direct netconsole writes (printks >> under console_lock not so useful), I think I found the race. > > Direct netconsole write would be a useful patch to have mainline I think > 8) Well I used a one line wrapper around

Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix race condition between console lock and cursor timer

2012-08-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > So we've had a fair few reports of fbcon handover breakage between > efi/vesafb and i915 surface recently, so I dedicated a couple of > days to finding the problem. > > Essentially the last thing we saw was the conflicting framebuffer > message

Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix race condition between console lock and cursor timer

2012-08-21 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 10:15 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > So after much tracing with direct netconsole writes (printks > > under console_lock not so useful), I think I found the race. > > Direct netconsole write would be a useful patch to have mainline I think > 8) could we make that use the earlyp

Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix race condition between console lock and cursor timer

2012-08-21 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 16:40 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > So after much tracing with direct netconsole writes (printks > under console_lock not so useful) I always use earlyprintk on serial.. -- Live Security Virtual Conf

Re: [PATCH] fbcon: fix race condition between console lock and cursor timer

2012-08-21 Thread Alan Cox
> So after much tracing with direct netconsole writes (printks > under console_lock not so useful), I think I found the race. Direct netconsole write would be a useful patch to have mainline I think 8) > Hopefully this fixes the problem for anyone seeing vesafb->kms > driver handoff. Not really

Re: drm: Branch 'master' - 5 commits

2012-04-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:50:01PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: >> +             /* just testing a limited # of formats to test single >> +              * and multi-planar path.. would be nice to add more.. >> +              */ >> +             if

Re: drm: Branch 'master' - 5 commits

2012-04-05 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:50:01PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > + /* just testing a limited # of formats to test single > + * and multi-planar path.. would be nice to add more.. > + */ > + if (!strcmp(p->format_str, "YUYV")) { > + p

Re: regression(?) 3.3-rc4 -> 3.3-rc5: drm intel hangs

2012-02-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:03:27PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear all, > > (please Cc) > > since upgrade to 3.3-rc5 I see the following behaviour repeatedly: > > Feb 28 11:42:47 mithrandir kernel: [15627.756071] > [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung >

Re: regression(?) 3.3-rc4 -> 3.3-rc5: drm intel hangs

2012-02-28 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear all, > > (please Cc) And you haven't changed userspace in any way? Dave. -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive onl

Re: regression(?) 3.3-rc4 -> 3.3-rc5: drm intel hangs

2012-02-28 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Norbert, Am Dienstag, den 28.02.2012, 13:03 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: > Dear all, > > (please Cc) > > since upgrade to 3.3-rc5 I see the following behaviour repeatedly: > > Feb 28 11:42:47 mithrandir kernel: [15627.756071] > [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elap

Re: drm: Branch 'master' - 2 commits

2011-12-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:23:55 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 02:31:58 -0800 (PST), ic...@kemper.freedesktop.org (Chris > Wilson) wrote: > > configure.ac |2 +- > > intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 27 +-- > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+),

Re: drm: Branch 'master' - 2 commits

2011-12-05 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 02:31:58 -0800 (PST), ic...@kemper.freedesktop.org (Chris Wilson) wrote: > configure.ac |2 +- > intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 27 +-- > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > New commits: > commit e73161a02b604742e3da3bca

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 29 (drm)

2011-11-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/28/2011 08:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 2028: > > The drm tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I > applied a patch. ERROR: "drm_helper_get_fb_bpp_depth" [drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx.ko] undefined! Full x86_64 randconfig file is att

Re: Question about Radeon 5450

2011-10-21 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Hi, today I upgraded from Radeon X700 to HD6570. It works very well on my Fedora 15/x86_64. Thank you very much to everyone working on the new Radeon driver generations. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi 2010-02-06 19:55 keltezéssel, Corbin Simpson írta: > > Not yet. Work is in progress. > > Post

Re: Regression in panic

2011-06-20 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I think this change is causing a regression I'm seeing in panic. > Before this change, I'd get a > reboot on panic (we've configured as such). > > With this change, my machine gets wedged if the machine is running in > X when the pa

Re: Regression in panic

2011-06-20 Thread Mandeep Singh Baines
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:03 PM, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> I think this change is causing a regression I'm seeing in panic. >> Before this change, I'd get a >> reboot on panic (we've configured as such). >> >> With this change, my

Re: CPU and GPU cache-coherence

2011-06-15 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2011-06-15 at 16:58 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Die, 2011-06-07 at 21:42 +0800, Donnie Fang wrote: > > 3D render image on WC AGP aperture BO and then CPU fetch the image > > from this bo, in order to achieve performance, after 3D finished > > rendering, validate this bo into cached sy

Re: CPU and GPU cache-coherence

2011-06-15 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2011-06-07 at 21:42 +0800, Donnie Fang wrote: > 3D render image on WC AGP aperture BO and then CPU fetch the image > from this bo, in order to achieve performance, after 3D finished > rendering, validate this bo into cached system memory and then read it > from system memory. But I always g

Re: [RFC] drm: emit change events when mode config changes

2011-04-16 Thread Chris Bandy
On 04/14/2011 12:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > We've already seen that apps want to monitor the display config, and > some (like upowerd) poll for changes since we don't provide a > notification for general mode config changes, just hotplug events. So > add a new drm event, with CHANGE=1 set in the

Re: [RFC] drm: emit change events when mode config changes

2011-04-15 Thread Adam Jackson
On 4/14/11 1:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > We've already seen that apps want to monitor the display config, and > some (like upowerd) poll for changes since we don't provide a > notification for general mode config changes, just hotplug events. So > add a new drm event, with CHANGE=1 set in the eve

Re: [RFC] drm: emit change events when mode config changes

2011-04-15 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:23:38 -0500 Chris Bandy wrote: > On 04/14/2011 12:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > /** > > + * drm_sysfs_change_event - generate a DRM uevent indicating a display > > config change > > + * @dev: DRM device > > + * > > + * Send a uevent for the DRM device specified by @dev.

Re: Lenovo resume from suspends hangs in i915_gpu_busy or so

2011-04-01 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:15:11 +0900 Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi all, > > adding dri-devel as I found it is actually not completely dead, > but hanging in some i915 problem. > > Copyied from screen: > Process ips-adjust ( > Stack: > > > ... > Call Trace: > > ... ? tick_

[Bug 28332] [RV620] Can not re-enable LVDS after using HDMI only

2011-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28332 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug 28332] [RV620] Can not re-enable LVDS after using HDMI only

2011-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28332 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 28332] [RV620] Can not re-enable LVDS after using HDMI only

2011-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28332 --- Comment #13 from Rafał Miłecki 2011-03-07 18:45:12 --- I've tried 2.6.37.2, it's free of this bug as well. I had to be some quickly fixed regression I met in wireless-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs

[Bug 28332] [RV620] Can not re-enable LVDS after using HDMI only

2011-02-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28332 --- Comment #12 from Rafał Miłecki 2011-02-16 23:07:40 --- This does not happen in 2.6.38-rc4. I am not sure about final version of 2.6.37 yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiv

[Bug 28332] [RV620] Can not re-enable LVDS after using HDMI only

2011-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28332 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||flor...@mickler.org,

[Bug 28332] [RV620] Can not re-enable LVDS after using HDMI only

2011-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28332 Andrew Morton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@linux-foundation.org Compo

Re: [Bug 21542] Radeon: No 50Hz (PAL) modes available after upgrading to 2.6.36

2011-02-06 Thread Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski
> I finally did the bisect and got this as a result after a lot of rebooting: > > " > 139315796778a6d5f67c644e2ff470ddc69efb7b is the first bad commit > commit 139315796778a6d5f67c644e2ff470ddc69efb7b > Author: Adam Jackson > Date: Tue Aug 3 14:38:19 2010 -0400 <...> > Maybe this should be ch

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Utilize the PCI API in the TTM framework.

2011-01-28 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:28:45AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Konrad, Dave > > Given our previous discussion on the list, I believe these patches > shouldn't introduce any regressions in the non-Xen case, however we > should probably be prepared to back them out quickly if that turns > out t

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Utilize the PCI API in the TTM framework.

2011-01-27 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Konrad, Dave Given our previous discussion on the list, I believe these patches shouldn't introduce any regressions in the non-Xen case, however we should probably be prepared to back them out quickly if that turns out to be the case... Thanks, Thomas On 01/07/2011 06:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszute

Re: Please revert nouveau.

2011-01-16 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > > > I've tested a bit here, current git with the revert does appear to work > > fine for me. > > So Anca has a 8800GT - is that what you're testing? I don't have an 8800 in the office

Re: Please revert nouveau.

2011-01-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > I've tested a bit here, current git with the revert does appear to work > fine for me. So Anca has a 8800GT - is that what you're testing? Also, there may be things like FB config issues and/or kernel command line arguments. For example, on

Re: Please revert nouveau.

2011-01-16 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:10 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Anca Emanuel wrote: > > > > In 2.6.37-git5 with the revert, the boot screen is changing the resolution. > > With this version, it don't. > > So, can you make a nice report of that - along with 'dmesg' for

Re: Please revert nouveau.

2011-01-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Anca Emanuel wrote: > > In 2.6.37-git5 with the revert, the boot screen is changing the resolution. > With this version, it don't. So, can you make a nice report of that - along with 'dmesg' for _both_ cases - to the right people? In this case, that would be at

Re: [Regression] [PATCH] intel_crt_detect_ddc() seems to be broken for DVI-I

2011-01-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:11:38 +0100, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote: > The patch below adds an additional check to make sure that there is > really an analog device attached (similar to the "Mac mini hack" in > intel_sdvo.c) Nice patch, thanks. I've applied this to my -fixes queue. -Chris --

Re: [PATCH 1/3] fb: fix overlapping test off-by-one.

2010-12-23 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:29:03AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > On Die, 2010-12-21 at 11:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > From: Dave Airlie > > > > On my system with a radeon x2, the first GPU was not overlapping vesa > > but the test decided it was. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > > ---

Re: [PATCH 3/3] fbcon: fix situation where fbcon gets deinitialised and can't reinit.

2010-12-23 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:41:17AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > Situation as follow: > 2 GPUs + vesafb + kms. > > GPU 1 is primary, vesafb binds to it as fb0 > radeon loads > GPU 0 loads as fb1 > GPU 1 loads, vesafb gets kicked off which causes fb0 to unbind > console, which

Re: [PATCH 1/3] fb: fix overlapping test off-by-one.

2010-12-20 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2010-12-21 at 11:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > On my system with a radeon x2, the first GPU was not overlapping vesa > but the test decided it was. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > --- > drivers/video/fbmem.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 dele

Re: Feedback: BKL / radeon pageflipping patches / DRM Vblank timestamping patches. 1st Try.

2010-10-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Alex, Thanks for the fast reply. I checked again the patches... I have chosen the ones from people.d.o. Kind Regards, - Sedat - On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> today, I started with testing "DRM Vblan

Re: DRM Vblank timestamping patches. 1st Try.

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Mario Kleiner wrote: > Hi all, > > after obsessing over these for another month after xds 2010, > this is the first version of my vblank timestamping patches that > i'm not totally ashamed off. > Mario, these look great. Nice work! Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher >

Re: Feedback: BKL / radeon pageflipping patches / DRM Vblank timestamping patches. 1st Try.

2010-10-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > today, I started with testing "DRM Vblank timestamping patches. 1st > Try." from Mario in combination with "radeon pageflipping patches" > from Alex together in a non-BKL config Kernel-setup. > > First some words to my system and hardwa

Re: DRM Vblank timestamping patches. 1st Try.

2010-10-24 Thread Mario Kleiner
Oh btw., the patches are against the current drm-radeon-testing tree, applied after commit... 21c74a8ea8b47eb6c3c621e36578f6e27f65c5c7 "drm, kdb, kms: Change mode_set_base_atomic() enter argument to be an enum" ... and should apply cleanly. thanks, -mario --

Re: New case for intel_swap_event

2010-10-11 Thread Ian Romanick
les people to put review comments in-line. - Fix the comment and license at the top of the file. - Re-wrap lines to 80 columns. - Fix broken whitespace usage }else{ should be } else { and if(foo){ should be if (foo) { etc. - piglit_report_result already calls exit, so the c

Re: [Bug 19012] Kernel Mode Setting Fails on Radeon X700

2010-09-25 Thread Alex Deucher
FWIW, the ddx has the pci id correctly associated with rv410, so it looks like it was just improperly ported to the drm. -- Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify applic

Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-11 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Andy, On Fr, 10 Sep 2010, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > I never said that it has anything to do with suspend to ram. > > Ah, sorry for misunderstanding. My GM45 system is configured to > automatically S2R on lid close so I tend to conflate the two... Mine, too, but not when running on AC. > Do t

Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-11 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fr, 10 Sep 2010, Andy Isaacson wrote: > FWIW, 2.6.36-rc3-00396-gbe6200a suspend-to-ram works for me on GM45 I never said that it has anything to do with suspend to ram. In fact, suspend to ram works perfectly without any problems. I only reboot after I installed a new kernel ... I will try so

Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-11 Thread Justin P. Mattock
On 09/10/2010 05:34 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 08:44:48AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: >> On Fr, 10 Sep 2010, Andy Isaacson wrote: >>> FWIW, 2.6.36-rc3-00396-gbe6200a suspend-to-ram works for me on GM45 >> >> I never said that it has anything to do with suspend to ram. > >

Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-10 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 08:44:48AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Fr, 10 Sep 2010, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > FWIW, 2.6.36-rc3-00396-gbe6200a suspend-to-ram works for me on GM45 > > I never said that it has anything to do with suspend to ram. Ah, sorry for misunderstanding. My GM45 system is

Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-10 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:41:17AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > running: 2.6.36-rc3+ (from git) on Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) GM45 > (Sony Vaio Z11) > Debian/unstable, so xserver 1.7.7, intel driver: 2.12.0 > > since some recent kernel I have the following problem: When closing the

Re: drm: Branch 'master'

2010-09-10 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 1.9.2010 02:53, Eric Anholt napsal(a): > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:17:43 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac > wrote: >> Dne 28.8.2010 05:55, Eric Anholt napsal(a): >>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:16:04 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac >>> wrote: On 27.8.2010 12:02, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at

Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-09 Thread Justin P. Mattock
On 09/09/2010 03:41 PM, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi all, > > running: 2.6.36-rc3+ (from git) on Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) GM45 > (Sony Vaio Z11) > Debian/unstable, so xserver 1.7.7, intel driver: 2.12.0 > > since some recent kernel I have the following problem: When closing the > lid o

Re: drm: Branch 'master'

2010-08-31 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:17:43 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Dne 28.8.2010 05:55, Eric Anholt napsal(a): > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:16:04 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac > > wrote: > >> On 27.8.2010 12:02, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > >>> > >>>

Re: drm: Branch 'master'

2010-08-31 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 28.8.2010 05:55, Eric Anholt napsal(a): > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:16:04 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac > wrote: >> On 27.8.2010 12:02, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: >>> Why keeping different name for C++ and C ? >>> Because changing th

Re: drm: Branch 'master'

2010-08-28 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:16:04 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > On 27.8.2010 12:02, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > > >> Why keeping different name for C++ and C ? > >> > > Because changing the name for C means breaking API for existing users

Re: drm: Branch 'master'

2010-08-27 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
On 27.8.2010 12:02, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > >> Why keeping different name for C++ and C ? >> > Because changing the name for C means breaking API for existing users, > which is not a nice thing to do. > Well if DRM would have very st

Re: drm: Branch 'master'

2010-08-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Why keeping different name for C++ and C ? > Because changing the name for C means breaking API for existing users, which is not a nice thing to do. Cheers, Julien ---

Re: drm: Branch 'master'

2010-08-27 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 27.8.2010 00:50, Eric Anholt napsal(a): > include/drm/drm.h|4 > intel/intel_bufmgr.h |6 +- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > New commits: > commit 23287f05cf2443ddf9e028e29beb5bd30979c6cf > Author: Eric Anholt > Date: Thu Aug 26 15:39:28 2010 -070

Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix support for PCI domains

2010-08-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 05:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > (For some reason I thought that went in ages ago ...) > > This fixes support for PCI domains in what should hopefully be a backward > compatible way along with a change to libdrm. > > When the interface version is set to 1.4, we assume

Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix support for PCI domains

2010-08-12 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > Hm, so pci_domain_nr should just return 0 on platforms where > > CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS isn't set.  I'd expect that to be the case when > > CONFIG_PCI=n...  Maybe we just need to shuffle the definition > > around? > > I suspect something like the attached would suffice. > > Or maybe moving the CO

Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix support for PCI domains

2010-08-12 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:33:35 +1000 > Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 05:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> > wrote: >> >> (For some reason I thought that went in a

Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix support for PCI domains

2010-08-12 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:33:35 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 05:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > wrote: > >> (For some reason I thought that went in ages ago ...) > >> > >> This fixes support for PCI domains in wha

Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix support for PCI domains

2010-08-12 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 05:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: >> (For some reason I thought that went in ages ago ...) >> >> This fixes support for PCI domains in what should hopefully be a backward >> compatible way along with a change

Re: [DRM] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context, drm_lastclose

2010-08-11 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 11 August 2010, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > > > > > moved the call to (inside drm_release) drm_lastclose inside dev->count_lock > > spinlock. > > drm_lastclose however takes dev->struct_mutex (now inside an atomic > > context): Yes

Re: [DRM] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context, drm_lastclose

2010-08-11 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > Hi Arnd, > this commit: > > commit 58374713c9dfb4d231f8c56cac089f6fbdedc2ec > Author: Arnd Bergmann > Date:   Sat Jul 10 23:51:39 2010 +0200 > >    drm: kill BKL from common code > > > moved the call to (inside drm_release) drm_lastclose i

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >