I have a t20 I can test on as well. I also plan to re-attempt dualhead
support using the new code as a base.
Alex
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:21:30AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:21:30AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/S3.zip
> >>http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/CLE266.zip
> >>
> >>The CLE266 has some fairly complicated Linux kernel e
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:21:30AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/S3.zip
> >>http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/CLE266.zip
> >>
> >>The CLE266 has some fairly complicated Linux kernel e
I don't know about the 3D stuff, but the 2D driver seems cleaner and
easier to follow than the current one (which this new one seems to be
based on) at first glance anyway...
Alex
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Ala
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/S3.zip
http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/CLE266.zip
The CLE266 has some fairly complicated Linux kernel entanglements to
resolve for the hardware mpeg engine stuff.
O.k. I'm gonna start a bran
On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 15:20, José Fonseca wrote:
> Another thing I noticed is that the Savage DRM is just a stub doesn't
> touch the hardware - the DMA is fired directly by the userspace 3D
> driver. I may be wrong but this can compromise the system security.
This is stuff that needs to be looked
Plus XvMC!
--- José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Savage: Savage MX/IX/ SuperSavage/ ProSavage/ Twister/K
>
> It seams that at the moment DRI is only enabled for the Twister and
> ProSavage:
>
> if ((psav->Chipset == S3_TWISTER)
> || (psav->Chipset == S3_PROSAVAGE)) {
>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:11:12PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:01, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I see. Well it really doesn't trouble me to rewrite the gamma driver
> > since I'll be changing all other drivers. Also the work I'm doing will
> > move a big chunk of each driver into c
On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 14:43, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I don't suppose they released any code or docs for duoview support
> for the old savage chips? I tried to add support for that a while
> back, but never was able to get it to work.
I don't.
Alan,
I don't suppose they released any code or docs for duoview support
for the old savage chips? I tried to add support for that a while
back, but never was able to get it to work.
Alex
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:33, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > No sec
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:33, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > No secrets/non disclosures. The VIA/S3G guys just want to get them into
> > > XFree86 proper and the code appears to already have all the right X
> > > Licenses attached.
> >
> > Gr
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:33, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > No secrets/non disclosures. The VIA/S3G guys just want to get them into
> > > XFree86 proper and the code appears to already have all the right X
> > > Licenses attached.
> >
> > Gr
On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:33, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > No secrets/non disclosures. The VIA/S3G guys just want to get them into
> > XFree86 proper and the code appears to already have all the right X
> > Licenses attached.
>
> Great. I can test the Savage MX/IX support with my IBM T20 laptop :)
>
В сообщении от 23 Июнь 2003 18:11 Alan Cox написал:
> > > BTW in the good news department, I received vendor contributed VIA and
> > > S3 DRI/DRM drivers yesterday. The kernel side needs some work yet but
> > > nothing major (except when it hits FreeBSD I guess).
> >
> > That's awesome news! Exactl
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:11:12PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:01, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I see. Well it really doesn't trouble me to rewrite the gamma driver
> > since I'll be changing all other drivers. Also the work I'm doing will
> > move a big chunk of each driver into c
On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:03, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> The Delta was never supported for 3D. What make of board is it Alan, that
> your Delta is broken for 2D ? And can you send me the XFree86 log file.
Email me an address off list and I'll send you the delta card. Its just
gathering dust in a cupbo
On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 13:01, José Fonseca wrote:
> I see. Well it really doesn't trouble me to rewrite the gamma driver
> since I'll be changing all other drivers. Also the work I'm doing will
> move a big chunk of each driver into common code (all the buffer
> management), so there will be little
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:41:00AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> José Fonseca wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:20:31AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>José Fonseca wrote:
> >>
> >>>The Gamma DRM driver is quite peculiar in several aspects. I'd like to
> >>>know if those differences are re
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:41:45PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 10:41, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > BTW, do we have a owner of such card among the subscribers which can do
> > > some testing when the time comes?
> >
> > I think Alan Cox. Alan Hourihane had one, but I think it die
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:41:45PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 10:41, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > BTW, do we have a owner of such card among the subscribers which can do
> > > some testing when the time comes?
> >
> > I think Alan Cox. Alan Hourihane had one, but I think it die
On Llu, 2003-06-23 at 10:41, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > BTW, do we have a owner of such card among the subscribers which can do
> > some testing when the time comes?
>
> I think Alan Cox. Alan Hourihane had one, but I think it died -- I find it
> very hard to keep gamma details in my head for som
José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:20:31AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
José Fonseca wrote:
The Gamma DRM driver is quite peculiar in several aspects. I'd like to
know if those differences are result of experiments which might be worth
to generalise to other drivers or if instead it's
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:20:31AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> José Fonseca wrote:
> >The Gamma DRM driver is quite peculiar in several aspects. I'd like to
> >know if those differences are result of experiments which might be worth
> >to generalise to other drivers or if instead it's mostly dep
José Fonseca wrote:
The Gamma DRM driver is quite peculiar in several aspects. I'd like to
know if those differences are result of experiments which might be worth
to generalise to other drivers or if instead it's mostly deprecated and
should be made more equal to the others.
It is mostly deprecate
24 matches
Mail list logo
