Re: [Dri-devel] Re: r128 PPC patches

2002-07-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 18:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >AGP has become very stable here since the radeon driver doesn't update > >the ring write pointer in ADVANCE_RING() but in the new COMMIT_RING(). > >Seems updating it 'too often' is no good, for whatever 'too often' may > >mean. > > I

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: r128 PPC patches

2002-07-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>AGP has become very stable here since the radeon driver doesn't update >the ring write pointer in ADVANCE_RING() but in the new COMMIT_RING(). >Seems updating it 'too often' is no good, for whatever 'too often' may >mean. I hate that. It should be fully stable or I would consider it unuseable :(

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: r128 PPC patches

2002-07-17 Thread Henry Worth
> > I applied and retested it, looks good. One pedantic little change to > the diff > that I missed is attached, it might avoid future problems. > Another version to fix a typo. Henry --- r128-dri-endianness.diff.orig Wed Jul 17 12:02:48 2002 +++ r128-dri-endianness.diffWed Jul 17 12

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: r128 PPC patches

2002-07-17 Thread Henry Worth
Michel Dänzer wrote: > >Thanks for testing. I've cleaned up the patch slightly to better fit >into the existing code and added a kludge for HOST_BIG_ENDIAN_EN: > >http://www.penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/r128-dri-endianness.diff > >Henry, if this works for you, I'll commit it. > I applied and ret

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: r128 PPC patches

2002-07-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 16:50, Leif Delgass wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote: > > > > These look very good to me, I'll commit them. Leif, can you verify they > > > don't break x86? I'd be very surprised, but it wouldn't be the first > > > time. :) > > > > I'll give these a try once

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: r128 PPC patches

2002-07-17 Thread Leif Delgass
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote: > > These look very good to me, I'll commit them. Leif, can you verify they > > don't break x86? I'd be very surprised, but it wouldn't be the first > > time. :) > > I'll give these a try once I've updated my tree, I was testing from > binaries before.

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: r128 PPC patches

2002-07-16 Thread Leif Delgass
On 17 Jul 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 02:10, Henry Worth wrote: > > > > Attached are patches for r128 on ppc. Rather little change to the r128 code > > was needed once I gave up on the char arrays for the vertex colors, and > > embraced the hw specific ordered named fields