Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 17:17, Cristiano De Michele wrote: > 1) text in open gl application is corrupted What application(s)? Corrupted how? > 2) I get only 200 fps (though glxinfo says dri is enabled) Please post the output of LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxgears -- Earthling Michel DÃnzer

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Cristiano De Michele
actually I compiled dri sources from CVS and I installed them. Synaptics driver now does not cause problems any more but two problems persist: 1) text in open gl application is corrupted 2) I get only 200 fps (though glxinfo says dri is enabled) regards Cristiano On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:44,

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Felix Kühling
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:50:34 +0100 Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if I compile dri-tree sources from CVS > what directories should I backup to restore the original xfree86 files > if the dri binaries won't work? > making a backup copy of /usr/X11R6/ and /etc/X11 > is enough? Y

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 06:29:51 -0800 (PST) > Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > --- Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ok but what about the other two problems? > > > in particular the fact that I can't use synaptics >

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Cristiano De Michele
if I compile dri-tree sources from CVS what directories should I backup to restore the original xfree86 files if the dri binaries won't work? making a backup copy of /usr/X11R6/ and /etc/X11 is enough? On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:44, Felix Kühling wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 06:29:51 -0800 (PST) >

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Felix Kühling
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 06:29:51 -0800 (PST) Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ok but what about the other two problems? > > in particular the fact that I can't use synaptics > > module is a serious problem for me and for now > > I can'

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Cristiano De Michele
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:29, Alex Deucher wrote: > --- Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ok but what about the other two problems? > > in particular the fact that I can't use synaptics > > module is a serious problem for me and for now > > I can't use dri binaries :( > > > > I'm

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok but what about the other two problems? > in particular the fact that I can't use synaptics > module is a serious problem for me and for now > I can't use dri binaries :( > I'm not familiar with the synaptics module. Is it a standard Xinpu

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Cristiano De Michele
ok but what about the other two problems? in particular the fact that I can't use synaptics module is a serious problem for me and for now I can't use dri binaries :( On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:20, Alex Deucher wrote: > --- Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > > this t

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > this the log of the X I'm currently running (plain > debian 4.3.0 package without latest dri installed), > I sent you this file just to show my hardware and settings... > with dri binaries installed I had in Xfree86.0.log > a line

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Cristiano De Michele
Hi Alex, this the log of the X I'm currently running (plain debian 4.3.0 package without latest dri installed), I sent you this file just to show my hardware and settings... with dri binaries installed I had in Xfree86.0.log a line like this: (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled and glxgears

Re: [Dri-devel] ati igp 320M

2004-03-04 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Cristiano De Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...I forgot to attach my Xfree86.0.log file, > here it is: > > This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any > way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches > submitted > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before repor