Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-03 Thread Aapo Tahkola
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:57:37 +0200 Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 03 June 2005 10:28, Aapo Tahkola wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote: > > >> Aapo Tahkola wrote: > > >> > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem. > > >> > After little testi

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-03 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
On Friday 03 June 2005 00:25, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > You guys seem to be getting closer... > > > When I had X + xfce4 + quake3 running (with this patch + > > > patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers + patch.remove-userspace-pacifiers) X > > > locked up within 2 minutes. > > > However,

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-03 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
On Friday 03 June 2005 10:28, Aapo Tahkola wrote: > > On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote: > >> Aapo Tahkola wrote: > >> > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem. > >> > After little testing it turns out that the lock up with > >> > progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the paci

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-03 Thread Aapo Tahkola
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote: >> Aapo Tahkola wrote: >> > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem. >> > After little testing it turns out that the lock up with >> > progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the pacifier sequences are applied >> to >> > clearbuffer. >> > >> >

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > > > You guys seem to be getting closer... > > When I had X + xfce4 + quake3 running (with this patch + > > patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers + patch.remove-userspace-pacifiers) X > > locked up within 2 minutes. > > However, X + quake3 (no window manager), I went thirty minutes before > > my f

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread khaqq
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:23:34 -0400 Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more thing... No matter what patches I apply, or what other X > programs and X clients I have running, I've never been able to get more > than 3-4 minutes out of UnrealTournament. I was able to play Q3A for an

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Aapo Tahkola wrote: Jerome Glisse wrote: On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Aapo Tahkola wrote: Jerome Glisse wrote: On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Aapo Tahkola wrote: Jerome Glisse wrote: On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote: > Aapo Tahkola wrote: > > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem. > > After little testing it turns out that the lock up with > > progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the pacifier sequences are applied to > > clearbuffer. > > > > Im startin

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Aapo Tahkola wrote: I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem. After little testing it turns out that the lock up with progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the pacifier sequences are applied to clearbuffer. Im starting to think that this sequence is needed whenever overwriting certain states r

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Vladimir Dergachev wrote: Adam, Great, thank you very much ! No, the system did not need to be actively swapping in fact this would probably have confused the results. (this is why I asked for "passive" apps) Could you also let me know the following information: Output of "free" At

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Boris Peterbarg
Aapo Tahkola wrote: Jerome Glisse wrote: On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or if it remov

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Vladimir Dergachev wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or if it removes certain lockups you are se

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-02 Thread Aapo Tahkola
> Jerome Glisse wrote: > >>On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Nicolai Haehnle wrote: >>> >>> >>> What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or i

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Pedro Ramalhais
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Vladimir Dergachev wrote: Are you doing a cold restart ? I would help a lot if you could try this with glxgears and/or quake3: I just gave it a shot with UnrealTournament. I'll try with Q3A in a little bit * cold restart * start one o

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
Adam, Great, thank you very much ! No, the system did not need to be actively swapping in fact this would probably have confused the results. (this is why I asked for "passive" apps) Could you also let me know the following information: Output of "free" Output of cat /proc/pci Output

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Vladimir Dergachev wrote: Are you doing a cold restart ? I would help a lot if you could try this with glxgears and/or quake3: I just gave it a shot with UnrealTournament. I'll try with Q3A in a little bit * cold restart * start one of 3d programs measure

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or if it removes certain lockups you are seeing. Well, it's hard for

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 16:39 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > On Wednesday 01 June 2005 09:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 21:52 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > today's lockup-chasing wrapup follows :) > > > > BTW. Look at the "removing r

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Jerome Glisse wrote: On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or if it removes certain lockups y

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 09:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 21:52 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > today's lockup-chasing wrapup follows :) > > BTW. Look at the "removing radeon_acknowledge_irqs hack.." thread and my > reply to David more speci

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Jerome Glisse
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > > >What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, > >and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any) > >and/or if it removes certain lockups you are seeing. > > >

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Nicolai Haehnle wrote: What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or if it removes certain lockups you are seeing. Well, it's hard for me to judge this patch :-) I played Q3A for j

Re: [r300] [patches] debugging lockups

2005-06-01 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 21:52 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > Hello everybody, > > today's lockup-chasing wrapup follows :) BTW. Look at the "removing radeon_acknowledge_irqs hack.." thread and my reply to David more specifically. I think we may be losing interrupts. I don't know if that can explai