On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:57:37 +0200
Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2005 10:28, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> > > On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote:
> > >> Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> > >> > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem.
> > >> > After little testi
On Friday 03 June 2005 00:25, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > You guys seem to be getting closer...
> > > When I had X + xfce4 + quake3 running (with this patch +
> > > patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers + patch.remove-userspace-pacifiers) X
> > > locked up within 2 minutes.
> > > However,
On Friday 03 June 2005 10:28, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote:
> >> Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> >> > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem.
> >> > After little testing it turns out that the lock up with
> >> > progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the paci
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote:
>> Aapo Tahkola wrote:
>> > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem.
>> > After little testing it turns out that the lock up with
>> > progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the pacifier sequences are applied
>> to
>> > clearbuffer.
>> >
>> >
> >
> > You guys seem to be getting closer...
> > When I had X + xfce4 + quake3 running (with this patch +
> > patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers + patch.remove-userspace-pacifiers) X
> > locked up within 2 minutes.
> > However, X + quake3 (no window manager), I went thirty minutes before
> > my f
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:23:34 -0400
Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more thing... No matter what patches I apply, or what other X
> programs and X clients I have running, I've never been able to get more
> than 3-4 minutes out of UnrealTournament. I was able to play Q3A for an
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:08, Boris Peterbarg wrote:
> Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> > I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem.
> > After little testing it turns out that the lock up with
> > progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the pacifier sequences are applied to
> > clearbuffer.
> >
> > Im startin
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem.
After little testing it turns out that the lock up with
progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the pacifier sequences are applied to
clearbuffer.
Im starting to think that this sequence is needed whenever overwriting
certain states r
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
Adam,
Great, thank you very much ! No, the system did not need to be actively
swapping in fact this would probably have confused the results. (this is
why I asked for "passive" apps)
Could you also let me know the following information:
Output of "free"
At
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
and/or if it remov
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any
regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or if it removes
certain lockups you are se
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
>>On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
and/or i
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
Are you doing a cold restart ?
I would help a lot if you could try this with glxgears and/or quake3:
I just gave it a shot with UnrealTournament. I'll try with Q3A in a
little bit
* cold restart
* start one o
Adam,
Great, thank you very much ! No, the system did not need to be actively
swapping in fact this would probably have confused the results. (this is
why I asked for "passive" apps)
Could you also let me know the following information:
Output of "free"
Output of cat /proc/pci
Output
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
Are you doing a cold restart ?
I would help a lot if you could try this with glxgears and/or quake3:
I just gave it a shot with UnrealTournament. I'll try with Q3A in a
little bit
* cold restart
* start one of 3d programs
measure
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
and/or if it removes certain lockups you are seeing.
Well, it's hard for
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 16:39 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 June 2005 09:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 21:52 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
> > > Hello everybody,
> > >
> > > today's lockup-chasing wrapup follows :)
> >
> > BTW. Look at the "removing r
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
and/or if it removes certain lockups y
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 09:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 21:52 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > today's lockup-chasing wrapup follows :)
>
> BTW. Look at the "removing radeon_acknowledge_irqs hack.." thread and my
> reply to David more speci
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
>
> >What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
> >and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
> >and/or if it removes certain lockups you are seeing.
> >
>
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
and/or if it removes certain lockups you are seeing.
Well, it's hard for me to judge this patch :-) I played Q3A for j
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 21:52 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> today's lockup-chasing wrapup follows :)
BTW. Look at the "removing radeon_acknowledge_irqs hack.." thread and my
reply to David more specifically. I think we may be losing interrupts. I
don't know if that can explai
25 matches
Mail list logo