On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:49:49 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fixing the drmto use the proper name will work fine..
I just checked in code that should fix the name problem. Give it a try
since I haven't figured out how to reproduce the problem yet.
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTEC
>
> I wish libdrm reported something more than just
>"error 1 (Operation not permitted)"
The problem is what I described, not setting the name, the strcmp fails as
the name it gets back from getversion is drm not the card name.. this
causes the libdrm to fail..
fixing the drmto use th
I fixed the programs in DRM cvs /tests to build. You can use them to
test drmOpen like this:
./drmstat -o radeon -v
It looks to me like the lower level part of drmOpen is working
correctly. You need to trace into libxf86drm and see what is failing
at a higher level. The ioctl nr=0 followed by n
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 10:59:35 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Thomas Hellström wrote:
Just tried out the core-based drm today, and I notice that
drmOpen("via") does not work anymore.
What is the correct
Hi.
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 10:59:35 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Thomas Hellström wrote:
Just tried out the core-based drm today, and I notice that
drmOpen("via") does not work anymore.
Wh
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 10:59:35 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > Just tried out the core-based drm today, and I notice that
> > drmOpen("via") does not work anymore.
> >
> > What is the correct way to fix up this?
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi!
Just tried out the core-based drm today, and I notice that
drmOpen("via") does not work anymore.
What is the correct way to fix up this? I suspect my client should be using
drmOpenByBusID ?
This is also broken on radeon's (yesterdays cod
> Just tried out the core-based drm today, and I notice that
> drmOpen("via") does not work anymore.
I think this should still work, as we are meant to retain backwards compat
for older clients.. drmOpen calls drmOpenByBusID anyways in libdrm..
there may be something else wrong..
Dave.
>
> Wha