Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dri-devel
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:44:44 PM
Subject: Re: i915: wait for buffer idle before writing relocations
[...]
I think the interesting usage that you point out is where the
application "knows" that a wait isn't necessary as the previously
r
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 13:27 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> OK, it sounds like you're talking about situations where the driver is
> modifying state in buffers *only* through changes to the relocations?
Yes, although I also don't expect this to be common.
> It's probably not surprising the fenc
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:15 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>> Keith,
>>
>> Thomas has just left for two weeks of (well deserved!) holiday, so he
>> may be slow to respond.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to have a look while he's away; we're
> finishing up the 965 TTM work, an
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:15 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Keith,
>
> Thomas has just left for two weeks of (well deserved!) holiday, so he
> may be slow to respond.
>
> In the meantime, have you considered how this will interact with
> userspace buffer pools? I know you guys aren't using them
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:15 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Keith,
>
> Thomas has just left for two weeks of (well deserved!) holiday, so he
> may be slow to respond.
Thanks for taking the time to have a look while he's away; we're
finishing up the 965 TTM work, and it is posing some challenges
Keith,
Thomas has just left for two weeks of (well deserved!) holiday, so he
may be slow to respond.
In the meantime, have you considered how this will interact with
userspace buffer pools? I know you guys aren't using them at this
point, but I'm of the opinion that they are an important faci
