Re: __glXCreateContextModes

2004-06-06 Thread Ian Romanick
Jon Smirl wrote: --- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are still other places where the drivers use glXGetProcAddress. That one isn't going to go away. If I had it to do over again, I probably would have picked a different name for the GetProcAddress function used by the drivers.

Re: __glXCreateContextModes

2004-06-06 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are still other places where the drivers use glXGetProcAddress. > That one isn't going to go away. If I had it to do over again, I > probably would have picked a different name for the GetProcAddress > function used by the drivers. Probably

Re: __glXCreateContextModes

2004-06-06 Thread Ian Romanick
Jon Smirl wrote: Why do the drivers need to look this up instead of linking straight to _gl_context_modes_create() in common? create_context_modes = (PFNGLXCREATECONTEXTMODES) glXGetProcAddress( (const GLubyte *) "__glXCreateContextModes" ); Direct linking would get rid o

__glXCreateContextModes

2004-06-06 Thread Jon Smirl
Why do the drivers need to look this up instead of linking straight to _gl_context_modes_create() in common? create_context_modes = (PFNGLXCREATECONTEXTMODES) glXGetProcAddress( (const GLubyte *) "__glXCreateContextModes" ); Direct linking would get rid of the last GLX