On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:56:02AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org
This patch has a bunch of
Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org
This patch has a bunch of whitespace damage at least in my inbox and
also in
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:00:09AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
I really dislike the fact that drm has bus specific junk all over the
generic code. Some ideas how to clean that up:
Add 'struct device *dev' into drm_device so you
I guess technically we could also drop the AGP requirement, but since it
worked
on my box with AGP=n it seemed to me like a NOP.
Its not a NOP, otherwise we'd remove it, AGP || AGP=n means if
AGP is enabled DRM must be enabled similiarly, it stops AGP=m + DRM=y
basically.
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org
This patch has a bunch of whitespace damage at least in my inbox and
also in patchwork
Please also
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |4 -
drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile|2
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c | 27 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
Following is a patch to allow platform devices on platforms without PCI
to register and operate as fully fledged DRM devices. I have been using
this code for some time now and I'm convinced that the model works, but
I'm posting this to get some constructive criticism on ways to improve
the
