Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-10-01 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:27:28 -0700, Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Mestnik wrote: Here is a straigth diff, I didn't do a udiff since I think we all know the glxinfo output fairly well. I did make one change s/, $//g and s/, /\n

Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-10-01 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:52:58 -0700 (PDT), Mike Mestnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:27:28 -0700, Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Mestnik wrote: Here is a straigth diff, I didn't do a udiff since I think we

Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-10-01 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:52:58 -0700 (PDT), Mike Mestnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:27:28 -0700, Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Mestnik wrote: Here

glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-09-30 Thread Mike Mestnik
I'm interested in switching back and fourth, if any one has some info on doing this better I'd like to know. Right now I'm symlinking libGL-fglrx.so.1.2 or libGL-dri.so.1.2 into libGL.so.1.2. I also have to unload and load kmods too, I do this by hand as well. I can go from DRI to fglrx fine,

Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-09-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 05:52, Mike Mestnik wrote: I'm interested in switching back and fourth, if any one has some info on doing this better I'd like to know. Right now I'm symlinking libGL-fglrx.so.1.2 or libGL-dri.so.1.2 into libGL.so.1.2. I also have to unload and load kmods too, I do this

Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-09-30 Thread Ian Romanick
Mike Mestnik wrote: Here is a straigth diff, I didn't do a udiff since I think we all know the glxinfo output fairly well. I did make one change s/, $//g and s/, /\n /g. I'm also attaching the 'source'. A better way to get meaningful diffs is to pipe the output of glxinfo to grep GL_ | sed

Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-09-30 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Ian Romanick schrieb: Looking at the list, I noticed a couple of odd things. Why don't the ATI drivers support GL_{ARB,EXT,NV}_texture_rectange or GL_{ARB,EXT}_blend_equation_separate? ATI sometimes makes strage decicions about the features their drivers support: Even though the r200 could

Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-09-30 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:27:28 -0700, Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Mestnik wrote: Here is a straigth diff, I didn't do a udiff since I think we all know the glxinfo output fairly well. I did make one change s/, $//g and s/, /\n /g. I'm also attaching the 'source'. A

Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

2004-09-30 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:21:43 +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian Romanick schrieb: Looking at the list, I noticed a couple of odd things. Why don't the ATI drivers support GL_{ARB,EXT,NV}_texture_rectange or GL_{ARB,EXT}_blend_equation_separate? ATI sometimes