I've quickly patched this into my devel tree for an in-house app, and it
don't look to work so well... the card is a mobility M7 7500 so it should
work..
I see a lot of white on the screen with some lines that are my app.. I
took a lend of one of the cards so I might get a chance to give it a try
Michel DÃnzer wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 14:21 +0100, Thomas HellstrÃm wrote:
Hmm, correct me If I'm wrong, but after a brief check in the code, it
seems like the current _DRM_LOCK_IS_HELD() used in dma buffer
submission IOCTLS just checks that the lock is indeed held, but not i
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1746
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 02:21 ---
with respec
> available device with no bus-id assigned to it and falls back to the old /proc
> interface:
>
> drmOpenByBusid: busid is PCI:1:0:0
> drmOpenDevice: minor is 0
> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK)
> drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 7
> drmOpenBy
> --- Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> You are probably right, and it would be quite easy to implement such
>> checks in the via command verifier as long as each lock is associated
>> with
>> a certain hardware address range.
>>
>> However, I don't quite see the point in plugging
Okay I've ported over the first chunk of work from Jon (with reorg by
me..) for the core/personality split for the DRM drivers,
The patch (>500K) is too big for LK so it is at
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/drm_core_split_bk-2.6.diff
It includes the other fixes from my bk tree also...
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Stephane,
Very impressive! I take it this has been derived from
reverse-engineering the ati driver?
How stable is this code now & how much testing has it had?
I've been using it for one month with different OpenGL apps (mostly
Quake 3 & friends, also tried most things in
Dave Airlie wrote:
I've quickly patched this into my devel tree for an in-house app, and it
don't look to work so well... the card is a mobility M7 7500 so it should
work..
Radeon 7500 is RV200, and I have a RV100. Maybe we've found one
difference between RV200 and R100 after all :)
I see a lot o
> >
> Radeon 7500 is RV200, and I have a RV100. Maybe we've found one difference
> between RV200 and R100 after all :)
hmm so it is... I think I have an M6 in the stack of cards at work, I'll
see if I haven't fried it and try and get some time to give it a go...
> >
> You probably need to fix th
I think this is happening for Thomas because he is running an older X
server that isn't negotiating to the most current DRM interface. I
believe the attached patch will fix the problem but we all need to
test it to make sure it doesn't have unintended side effects. I don' t
have an old X server ar
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1746
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 08:49 ---
I've got a
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 07:16:56AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> How stable is this code now & how much testing has it had? How close do
> you think it is to be ready for CVS?
With unmodified hyperz patches my system (Linux-2.6.9, Athlon, Radeon 9100)
crash/reboot when I run glxgears.
I tried
Moin,
create_lk_drm calls
( cd linux/ ; make drm_pciids.h )
which fails if LINUXDIR isn't set correctly. the attached patch sets LINUXDIR
to the path specified on the command line.
--
c u
henning
Index: scripts/create_lk_drm.sh
===
Am Dienstag, 2. November 2004 02:11 schrieb Stephane Marchesin:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patches enable HyperZ on radeon (RV100 only for now).
>
> People always ask me for an HyperZ benchmark, so :
> HyperZ gets me 45% more fps (48 fps -> 70 fps) in Quake3 four.dm68
> (Radeon 7000, athlon XP 2600).
I've been playing with the new savage patches. The latest cvs version
seems to have fixed the unresolved symbols I was getting and everything
seems to be working great. I've tested with glxgears, chromium and
regular usage, are there any other easy tests to run that would be
helpful?
I am havi
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 02:11 +0100, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
>
> Index: src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_context.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/mesa/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_context.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.33
> diff -u -r1.33 r
16 matches
Mail list logo
