Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5459
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-06 18:49 ---
(In r
Hello again
Just for the record I have downgraded to debian stable just to check a few
things and the speed difference is definitely noticeable. glxgears cogs fly
in debian stable and in blender a simple textured round shape moves with no
delay/jitter. with latest X and 2.4.15 kernel the same
I've been having some fun with fragment shader and found allot of ops
missing. someone might be interested in some more ops.
Fragment ops added:
- ABS
- CMP
- DP4
- DPH
- DST
- EX2
- FLR
- FRC
- LG2
- MAX
- MIN
- RCP
- SGE
- SLT
- XPD
Fragment ops still missing:
- COS
- KIL
- LIT
- SCS
- SIN
T
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5422
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Am Freitag, den 06.01.2006, 17:22 +0100 schrieb Rune Petersen:
> - Missing Commit from r300.sf.net:
> When trying to Implement the KIL ops I found a commit by Ben Skeggs on
> r300.sf.net that was lost in the Mesa tree:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7728162&forum_id=42
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5459
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 21:00 ---
I'm n
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2418
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-04 20:41 ---
Creat
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5459
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-07 05:04 ---
Okay,
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5531
Summary: DRI enabled freezes X when running any opengl app
Produ
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:05 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 1/5/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 02:30 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 1/5/06, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a ATI AIW Radeon
On 1/6/06, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:05 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 1/5/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 02:30 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>
>
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Then with the X300 - X850, I think it's only the X800 and X850 cards
have 256-bit interfaces, correct? Do X800 cards experience the same
lockups?
My X800 XT is working fine, the only real problem I have with lockups
are with Quake 3 and is unrelated.
Rune Petersen
Alex Deucher wrote:
On 1/6/06, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:05 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 1/5/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 02:30 +0100, Jerome
> Is it safe to say that this is only a problem for cards with 256 bit
> memory interfaces? From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_9700_core:
>
> Radeon 9700 275 256-bit
> Radeon 9800 325 256-bit
> Radeon 9700 Pro 325 256-bit
> Radeon 9800 Pro 380 256-bit
> Rad
On 1/6/06, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> >On 1/6/06, Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:05 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> On 1/5/06, Ben
On 1/5/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Have you tried checking what's going on with the card memory map ?
> (values of MC_AGP_LOCATION, MC_FB_LOCATION, CONFIG_MEMSIZE,
> CONFIG_APER_SIZE, HDP control and how they are munged by X and DRI ?
> There is definitely a bug or two
On 1/7/06, Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/5/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried checking what's going on with the card memory map ?
> > (values of MC_AGP_LOCATION, MC_FB_LOCATION, CONFIG_MEMSIZE,
> > CONFIG_APER_SIZE, HDP control and how the
> More people testing benh patch on radeon 9800 (or any other
> radeon that used to lockup) are welcome:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2005-December/011679.html
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2005-December/011717.html
>
> It really seems to fix it. I have been on u
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 1/7/06, Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/5/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you tried checking what's going on with the card memory map ?
(values of MC_AGP_LOCATION, MC_FB_LOCATION, CONFIG_MEMSIZE,
CONFIG_APER_SIZE, HDP control an
20 matches
Mail list logo
