http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
Summary: [i915 i965] glStencilFuncSeparate doesn't work
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prior
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #2 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 01:30:08 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=14614)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14614)
xorg conf
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #1 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 01:29:43 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=14613)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14613)
xorg log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.c
The attached patch adds another PCI device ID for the AMD RS690 IGP
chipset. From working with the radeonhd driver, this hardware seems
pretty much the same as the 0x791e PCI ID'ed hardware. We've found both
ID's on cards that were sold as X1200, X1250, and X1270.
--
Coleman Kane
diff --git a/s
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> As i am in the process of cleaning up and making radeon
> fence things bullet proof I am wondering what are the
> difference btw fence flags and fence types ? Well i guess
> the questions is more why fence flags are needed ?
>
> My understanding is that fence_f
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:03:34 +0100
Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > As i am in the process of cleaning up and making radeon
> > fence things bullet proof I am wondering what are the
> > difference btw fence flags and fence types ? Well i gue
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:03:34 +0100
> Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> As i am in the process of cleaning up and making radeon
>>> fence things bullet proof I am wondering what are the
>>> difference btw
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Co
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #3 from Kristian Høgsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 06:50:38
PST ---
Did the commit also introduce the libtxc_dxtn.so warning?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> As i am in the process of cleaning up and making radeon
>> fence things bullet proof I am wondering what are the
>> difference btw fence flags and fence types ? Well i guess
>> the questions is more why fence flags are needed ?
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #4 from Kristian Høgsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 08:27:45
PST ---
Commit 60c0f09abb9421de359cd92e094a943d650fc7fa should fix this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You ar
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Hellström
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > As i am in the process of cleaning up and making radeon
> > fence things bullet proof I am wondering what are the
> > difference btw fence flags and fence types ? Well i
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14129
Phil Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Res
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:41 +0100
Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Some additional info on this:
> flush() only needs to start a flush, and poll() will report it when it's
> done, but note that on, for example intel, the flush mechanism currently
> impleme
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13957
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |dri-
|
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13957
--- Comment #10 from Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27
09:45:32 PST ---
still happening with 7.0.3~rc2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:41 +0100
> Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> Some additional info on this:
>> flush() only needs to start a flush, and poll() will report it when it's
>> done, but note that on, for example intel, the f
Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Hellström
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> > Hi Thomas,
>> >
>> > As i am in the process of cleaning up and making radeon
>> > fence things bullet proof I am wondering what are the
>> > difference btw fen
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Thomas Hellström
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Hellström
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >> > Hi Thomas,
> >> >
> >> > As i am in the process of cleaning up and
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 10:52:41
PST ---
Can you check with latest git HEAD?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:49 -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> shared-core/i915_dma.c | 13 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit 72983ff30183745cd96760aa07b857c44daebde7
> Author: Thomas Hellstrom
> Date: Wed Feb 27 19:46:28 2008 +0100
>
>
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:49 -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>
>> shared-core/i915_dma.c | 13 +
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> New commits:
>> commit 72983ff30183745cd96760aa07b857c44daebde7
>> Author: Thomas Hellstrom
>> Date: Wed F
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:41 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:49 -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >
> >> shared-core/i915_dma.c | 13 +
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> New commits:
> >> commit 72983ff301
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
--- Comment #5 from Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 12:43:16 PST ---
Offhand guess, moving the wait for idle from the actually-applying-a-relocation
path to before the check-and-apply-relocations results in much more idling.
The ne
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:41 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>> Eric Anholt wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:49 -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>
shared-core/i915_dma.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 12:56:57
PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Offhand guess, moving the wait for idle from the
> actually-applying-a-relocation
> path to before the check-and-apply-relocation
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:03:32 +0100
Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:41 +0100
> > Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >> Some additional info on this:
> >> flush() only needs to start a
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:03:32 +0100
> Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:41 +0100
>>> Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Thomas Hellström wrote:
Some addition
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 21:55 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:41 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> >> Eric Anholt wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:49 -0800, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> shared-core/i915_dma
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #5 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 17:04:57 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Did the commit also introduce the libtxc_dxtn.so warning?
>
no, it didn't
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
--- Comment #7 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 17:13:57 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you check which of the commits listed is causing this?
>
> /Thomas
>
both commits are causing this.
one is from 104FPS to 95FPS
one
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
--- Comment #8 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 17:16:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can you check with latest git HEAD?
>
I tried latest git HEAD, it's around 95FPS now.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.o
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14699
--- Comment #6 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 17:41:47 PST ---
I tried git tip, this issue still exists on both i915 and i965
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14222
--- Comment #5 from Colin.Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 22:51:17 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=14628)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14628)
Xorg.0.log
I retest this case .and this is the new log & backtrace .
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14222
--- Comment #6 from Colin.Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 22:52:21 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=14629)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14629)
backtrace
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.
So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and
what I'm up to with it..
So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting
in it, whether this is a default or a special boot option for the user
I won't decide for a while.
But with this in mind I've check
On a cross-platform source tree there are files that:
(a) should keep their unix LF line endings (e.g., shell scripts),
(b) should keep their DOS CR+LF line endings (.inf files), and
(c) should switch whatever the user prefers and have CR & CR+LF treated
indiscriminately (C/C++ source files).
For
37 matches
Mail list logo