Re: [PATCH] rate limit drm:radeon_cp_idle/reset errors

2008-09-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 11:19:19 +0200 Roberto Oppedisano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When switching from kwin composite wm (KDE 4.1) to compiz I often hit the > following error: > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138203] [drm:radeon_cp_idle] *ERROR* > radeon_cp_idle called without lock hel

Re: [PATCH] rate limit drm:radeon_cp_idle/reset errors

2008-09-09 Thread Dave Airlie
> > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138774] [drm:radeon_cp_start] > > > > *ERROR* radeon_cp_start called without lock held, held 0 owner > > > > f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138968] [drm:radeon_cp_idle] > > > > *ERROR* radeon_cp_idle called with

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #21 from Doron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 01:42:58 PST --- OK, better luck this time... I read about no stripping and some compiler flags and re-compiled X, DRM and xf86-video-ati (again...). I also found the way to turn on the

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #23 from Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 02:41:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #20) > I'd like to report that I had pretty similar problems. > Had them with kernels 2.6.25 and .26, but they happen randomly, when I use

Re: [PATCH] rate limit drm:radeon_cp_idle/reset errors

2008-09-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:37:32 +0200 Roberto Oppedisano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:08:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 11:19:19 +0200 Roberto Oppedisano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > When switching from kwin composite wm (KDE 4.1) to co

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #22 from Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 02:33:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #21) > #3 0xb79d2534 in RADEONWaitForIdleCP (pScrn=0xa126fd0) at > radeon_commonfuncs.c:697 Okay, so this does look like a GPU lockup af

Re: [PATCH] rate limit drm:radeon_cp_idle/reset errors

2008-09-09 Thread Roberto Oppedisano
Dave Airlie ha scritto, Il 09/09/2008 10.15: > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138774] [drm:radeon_cp_start] > *ERROR* radeon_cp_start called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 > f68f6840 > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138968] [drm:radeon_cp_idle] >

[Bug 17491] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.4.2-r1 xorg-server-1.5.0 mesa-7. 1 DRI enabled by looks weird

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17491 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 03:58:43 PST --- The 'error message' (Failed to initialize TTM buffer manager) is just a warning. You are using a drm kernel driver that doesn't support TTM. But that's nothing

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #24 from Doron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 04:39:11 PST --- (In reply to comment #22) > Okay, so this does look like a GPU lockup after all. Can you get a backtrace > with the DRI disabled as well? GPU lockups are unusual with t

[Bug 17491] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.4.2-r1 xorg-server-1.5.0 mesa-7. 1 DRI enabled by looks weird

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17491 --- Comment #7 from Maciej Józiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 04:54:48 PST --- I emerged driconf and disabled vblank-sync. Everything seems to work now. glxgears looks normal and does slightly over 600 fps. It's slow but it works :) Sup

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #25 from Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 04:44:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #24) > I tried several times repeating it with DRI off. The problem is much more > intense. ie- Once X hangs, gdb hangs as well, including

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #26 from Doron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 07:07:02 PST --- Hi Michel. I tried RenderAccel off, but no real change. So I remarked NoAccel, and added DRI off. I'm attaching gdb log. I used RADEONEnterVT as a break point. It look

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #27 from Doron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 07:09:24 PST --- Created an attachment (id=18782) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=18782) gdb tracing with break point. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedeskt

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #28 from Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 07:31:20 PST --- (In reply to comment #26) > Can you have a look and see ? I've never seen this kind of gdb output, and looking at it I can't help but feeling like looking for

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #28 from Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 07:31:20 PST --- (In reply to comment #26) > Can you have a look and see ? I've never seen this kind of gdb output, and looking at it I can't help but feeling like looking for

[Bug 17075] Radeon + DRI on r300: X goes 99.9% CPU

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17075 --- Comment #30 from Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-09 08:15:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #29) > Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. > 0xb7f47424 in __kernel_vsyscall () > Run till exit from #0 0xb7f47424 in

Re: [GEM i945] X server eats lots of cpu after resuming from s2ram

2008-09-09 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 14:24 +0100, Johannes Engel wrote: > Hi guys, > > since I do not quite know who is the culprit for that problem, I want to > ask here first before filing a bug report. Maybe one of you has got an > idea how to deal with that. > The problem is as follows: > > Using kernel 2

[Bug 17426] [G33] gl-117 and doom3 can not run smoothly due to very low performance

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17426 Gordon Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 17415] segfault when run glxinfo and some 3D games( openarena and ut2004)

2008-09-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17415 haihao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|