David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 08:37:38PM +0200, Alexander Stohr wrote:
From: Angel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
In a solution to this i decided to upgrade to
the DRI-CVS, however when making World it ends with the
following error.
/usr/i386-slackware-linux/bin/ld: cannot find
Hello people!
I was just wondering, what's the plan regarding
Radeon 8500 DRI support?
I been hearing rumors about ATI switching to
a unified driver structure much like Nvidia's.
Can anyone verify wether this is true or not,
and if it is true, how it will affect the DRI project?
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Dacobi Coding wrote:
Hello people!
I was just wondering, what's the plan regarding
Radeon 8500 DRI support?
I been hearing rumors about ATI switching to
a unified driver structure much like Nvidia's.
Can anyone verify wether this is true or not,
and if it is true,
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
/*
* The following changes are required in order to disable gcc's new
* 'merge-constants' optimization, because the XFree86 module loader is
not
* yet aware of the new ELF sections it produces, and will cause module
* loading to fail. -
On Thursday 27 September 2001 19:55, you wrote:
Dacobi Coding wrote:
Hello people!
...
Not to say that ATI won't switch to a binary-only driver as well, but
anyway...
But are they planing to, or have they allready releaced the specs
for the new Radeon chips? And I mean full specs complete
Dacobi Coding wrote:
But are they planing to, or have they allready releaced the specs
for the new Radeon chips? And I mean full specs complete
with V/P Shaders and TL?
Did they ever release specs for the original Radeon? No. One would
guess the same policy will apply in this case as
From: Gareth Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 8500, what's the plan?
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:05:13 -0700
Dacobi Coding wrote:
But are they planing to, or have they allready releaced the specs
for the new
Simon Fowler wrote:
About a month or two ago the DRI cvs tree was pruned a lot, so
that it only really has the code needed for building the xserver
and a few libs that need modifications from the base XFree86 4.x
install - this is what's causing the problem.
Actually, I think the problem is
On Thursday 27 September 2001 21:05, you wrote:
Dacobi Coding wrote:
But are they planing to, or have they allready releaced the specs
for the new Radeon chips? And I mean full specs complete
with V/P Shaders and TL?
Did they ever release specs for the original Radeon? No. One would
They did release specs (under NDA) to many people
(including yourself through PI/VA Linux).
Keep in mind that ATI was paying VA Linux to develop Radeon Linux drivers at
the time.
- Daniel Vogel, Programmer, Epic Games Inc.
___
Dri-devel mailing
From: Gareth Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 8500, what's the plan?
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:56:53 -0700
David Johnson wrote:
They did release specs (under NDA) to many people (including
yourself
through
On Thursday 27 September 2001 21:56, you wrote:
David Johnson wrote:
They did release specs (under NDA) to many people (including yourself
through PI/VA Linux).
Sure, but not to people in the general open source community, and with the
demise of PI/VA, I would say the chances of a driver
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:19:46PM +, David Johnson wrote:
Sure, that is a valid point but we need to remember that in the past
ATI has not been adverse to supporting open source drivers or to
releasing specs to qualified people.
They are very friendly actually. They provided me
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Peter Surda wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:19:46PM +, David Johnson wrote:
Sure, that is a valid point but we need to remember that in the past
ATI has not been adverse to supporting open source drivers or to
releasing specs to qualified people.
14 matches
Mail list logo
