[Bug 4337] ATI Rage 128: messed up X

http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-26 01:17 --- removing the lines mentioned in #16 works fine :) --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Re: [r300] what about *BSD?

Wait, I have one thing that's not from CVS. I patched system compiler from GCC 3.4.2 to GCC 3.4.4 snapshot (20050318). I updated GCC because I found some nasty optimization bugs for AMD64 in GCC 3.4.2. Can this be the fix? Maybe, weird things can happen... To tell the true have no clue if

Re: R300 pixel shader

I've been doing quite a bit of work towards getting rid of the EASY_PFS_INSTR and co. macros. My aim is to have a function similar to i915's i915_emit_arith, that will handle swizzling/negation transparently. If all goes to plan, I should have something that works okay in the next couple of

Re: [PATCH] drm/drm_os_linux: use wait_event_interruptible_timeout()

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: Hi, Please consider applying. Description: Rather than use custom code in DRM_WAIT_ON() to do exactly what wait_event_interruptible_timeout() does, use the function and just change the return values appropriately. I've applied this to CVS..