On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:50 +0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jin, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kristian H?gsberg wrote on Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:35 AM:
Hi,
I just committed the last big chunk of DRI2 work, the direct
rendering
support.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Xiang, Haihao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:50 +0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jin, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kristian H?gsberg wrote on Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:35 AM:
Hi,
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15203
--- Comment #28 from Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 01:48:07 PST
---
(In reply to comment #27)
I would rather we just disable the writeback than adding some work around[...]
Disabling writeback is just a workaround...
--
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15203
--- Comment #29 from Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 02:14:48 PST
---
I think the best intermediate solution would be to increase the timeout. In the
long run, the error should be propagated and handled properly everywhere. The
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15203
--- Comment #30 from Markus Amsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 03:34:50 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=15627)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=15627)
Wait forever fix
Currently I have this patch in my tree. It's no
So, we should really fix this. The two options are :
- Keep a different calling convention under linux (cdecl by default,
which requires saving esi by hand in the shader) and apply Victor's
patch which saves restores this register
- Use the same calling convention on all platforms, that is change
Sorry, this slipped through the net a little... Given how much is hardcoded
with rtasm, I'd prefer to use a single calling convention everywhere, whether
that's STDCALL or CDECL or something else I don't mind. Probably STDCALL
because some compilers are too dumb to use anything else??
In
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15203
--- Comment #31 from Markus Amsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 06:01:37 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=15628)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=15628)
Handle error in BEGIN_RING macro
Is this an acceptable patch? Return
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:50 +0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jin, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kristian H?gsberg wrote on Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:35 AM:
Hi,
I just committed the last big chunk of DRI2 work, the direct
rendering
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 15:43 +0100, Steven J Newbury wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:50 +0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jin, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kristian H?gsberg wrote on Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:35 AM:
Hi,
I just
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15330
Summary: DRI is not working with 945GME
Product: DRI
Version: DRI CVS
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
11 matches
Mail list logo