On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:41:25PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:35 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
misery ensues. This patch is based on a patch found on dri-devel by
Shaohua Li, but Keith P. expressed reticence that the changes unfairly
penalized other hardware.
(The mm/shmem.c hunk is
The general definition block contains the child device tables, which include
the child device info. For example: device slave address, device dvo port,
device type.
We will get the info of SDVO device by parsing the general definition blocks.
Only when a valid slave address is found, it is
The size of general definition block varies on different platform/machines.
In such case the number of child device is also different.
And it will be better to get the number of child device in general definition
block dynamically.
The number of child device can be calculated by the following
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on x86_64:
my 32-bit PAE machine with (slightly!) 4GB shows no ZONE_DMA32.
Does this patch perhaps depend on another, to enable DMA32 on 32-bit
PAE, or am I just in a muddle?
No,
Hi,
The following is the patch set that use the SDVO device info
parsed from general definition block to initialize the SDVO device.
By parsing the general definition block of VBT we can get the
relationship between the DVO port and slave address. For example: the
SDVO wiring,
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
misery ensues. This patch is based on a patch found on dri-devel by
Shaohua Li, but Keith P. expressed reticence that the changes
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:35 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
misery
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 98560e1..06600d1 100644
---
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:18:40AM +0800, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on x86_64:
my 32-bit PAE machine with (slightly!) 4GB shows no ZONE_DMA32.
Does this patch perhaps depend on another,
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21942
--- Comment #3 from Ekaterina Filippova k...@iki.rssi.ru 2009-05-27 04:37:57
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=26244)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26244)
The content of the Xorg.0.log.old
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21936
--- Comment #8 from Adam K Kirchhoff ad...@voicenet.com 2009-05-27 05:12:43
PST ---
Do you have any compositing enabled? Does this happen with other opengl
applications?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21942
Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26244|application/octet-stream|text/plain
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009 17:59:49 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364
The wheels seem to have fallen off the DRM code lately :(
This one might be related
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21967
Summary: xpress200m GPU hang, kernel/x loop when attempting
DRI/DRM
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21967
--- Comment #1 from William L. Thomson Jr. w...@obsidian-studios.com
2009-05-27 08:19:20 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=26250)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26250)
xorg config
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21967
--- Comment #2 from William L. Thomson Jr. w...@obsidian-studios.com
2009-05-27 08:22:06 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=26251)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26251)
another X log file this time with no loop, also
On Fri, 15 May 2009 19:21:40 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
Now all the DRM debug info will be printed if the boot option of
drm.debug=1 is added. Sometimes it is inconvenient. We will get
too much unrelated info.
This will separate several DRM debug levels and the debug
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21849
--- Comment #3 from Fabio fabio@libero.it 2009-05-27 09:16:42 PST ---
I started bisecting mainline kernel and noticed a big merge from drm-next (
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=drm-next
) that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com 2009-05-27
16:33:26 ---
PAT is enabled. Card is Radeon XPress 200M RC410.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21582
--- Comment #14 from Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net 2009-05-27
10:14:46 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=26254)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26254)
full backtrace of Xorg
The mismatch messages come all the
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 08:42 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:18:40AM +0800, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on x86_64:
my 32-bit PAE machine with (slightly!) 4GB shows no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 18:06:10
---
Is this reproducible? If so does booting with nopat help? Also, what do you
mean by 'clean' kernel? Are you running with local changes? Does this still
happen
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 18:15:28
---
[ 648.278242] [drm:i915_get_vblank_counter] *ERROR* trying to get vblank
count
for disabled pipe 1
This message is gone in 2.6.30-rc7. The rest does not look
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 18:17:26
---
(In reply to comment #5)
[ 648.278242] [drm:i915_get_vblank_counter] *ERROR* trying to get vblank
count
for disabled pipe 1
This message is gone in
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #2 from Ruslan b7.10110...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 11:52:05 PST ---
System environment:
-- chipset:
$ lspci |grep Host
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82915G/P/GV/GL/PL/910GL Memory
Controller Hub (rev 04)
-- system
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #4 from Ruslan b7.10110...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 11:58:24 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=26261)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26261)
xorg.conf
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #3 from Ruslan b7.10110...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 11:57:39 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=26260)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26260)
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21582
--- Comment #15 from Lowell Alleman lowel...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 15:11:09
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=26265)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26265)
Additional backtrace
Not sure if additional backtraces will be
30 matches
Mail list logo
