On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:14:34 +0100, Tobias Klauser tklau...@distanz.ch wrote:
The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
feature.
Signed-off-by:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13683
--- Comment #37 from Jan Kreuzer kontrolla...@gmx.de 2009-12-24 11:05:37 ---
I am on daves radeon-testing tree. I finally had time to do an bisect, git
bisect shows:
7923c615b811945a9d9f456c92a7a32c34167458 is the first bad commit
commit
The encoder variable can be NULL in this function so I believe it should
be checked before dereference.
Coverity CID: 13253
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
index
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the
NULL test.
Coverity CID: 13334
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
index cb4cd97..f4f5942 100644
---
If there is an invalid radeon family the fw_name is NULL and causes an
NULL pointer dereference.
This just adds a check for something unexpected.
Coverity CID: 13252
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cp.c
There are a couple of array overruns, and some associated confusion in
the code.
This is just a wild guess at what the code should actually look like.
Coverity CID: 13305 13306
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_legacy_tv.c
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the
NULL test.
Coverity CID: 13335
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index 02bcdb1..c0104b0 100644
---
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the
NULL test.
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c
index b79ecc4..2f349a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c
If there is an invalid family the fw_name is NULL and causes an
NULL pointer dereference.
This just adds a check for something unexpected.
Coverity CID: 13251
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
index
If drm_addmap() fails master_priv is leaked.
Coverity CID: 13195
Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cp.c
index 0b2f9c2..06123ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cp.c
+++
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25776
--- Comment #2 from Bartłomiej Zimoń uz...@o2.pl 2009-12-24 07:38:43 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
radeon loaded with modeset=1 crash with some data notated (could be usefull):
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference ar
Il Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:06:16PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki ha scritto:
V2: reorganize functions, fix modesetting calls
V3: rebase patch, use radeon's workqueue
V4: enable on tested chipsets only, request VBLANK IRQs
V5: enable PM on older hardware (IRQs, mode_fixup, dpms)
V6: use separate dynpm
W dniu 24 grudnia 2009 17:32 użytkownik Luca Tettamanti
kronos...@gmail.com napisał:
Il Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:06:16PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki ha scritto:
V2: reorganize functions, fix modesetting calls
V3: rebase patch, use radeon's workqueue
V4: enable on tested chipsets only, request VBLANK
Am Freitag 18 Dezember 2009 15:44:35 schrieb Jerome Glisse:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:47:00PM +0100, Johannes Hirte wrote:
Am Mittwoch 16 Dezember 2009 20:31:48 schrieb Johannes Hirte:
Am Mittwoch 16 Dezember 2009 19:41:48 schrieb Jerome Glisse:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 03:58:30PM +0100,
2009/12/24 Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com:
W dniu 24 grudnia 2009 17:32 użytkownik Luca Tettamanti
kronos...@gmail.com napisał:
I think it would be safer to execute that code in the IH (or in a tasklet,
which is guaranteed to run after the handler); the only problem I see is
that
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25506
--- Comment #12 from Steven Noonan ste...@uplinklabs.net 2009-12-24 15:29:42
PST ---
Any progress on a patch for this bug?
( Also, I forgot to mention previously that reverting the two commits Alex
mentions in comment 5 does eliminate the
16 matches
Mail list logo