http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15186
Robert Schedel r.sche...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 11:47, Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/2/4 Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org:
IIRC old radeon drm doesn't have any thing to dump GPU command stream.
Look at http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/R5xx_Acceleration_v1.4.pdf to see
what radeon GPU stream
Hello,
I am interested in getting DRI working on my ATI Rage XL card under
2.6.31-14 with mach64_drv 6.8.2 (Xorg 1.6.3 from Ubuntu Karmic koala).
Git says that the mach64 driver was deleted, along with shared-code,
linux-core, etc, in commit 9dd361. Do these drivers live anywhere else
now? Has
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15186
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Paul Menzel
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Pauli Nieminen:
[…]
+/* Who ever call radeon_fence_emit should call ring_lock and ask
s/ever call/ever calls/
Too bad you are asking too much from me.
2010/2/7 Stephane Marchesin stephane.marche...@gmail.com:
From what I recall, all the ia64 AGP chipsets (well the zx1 and the
460) have to be run:
- without side band adressing
- without fast writes
- at 4x speed
otherwise they're unstable.
I think by default agpgart puts them at AGP 1x
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Catalin Patulea c...@vv.carleton.ca wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in getting DRI working on my ATI Rage XL card under
2.6.31-14 with mach64_drv 6.8.2 (Xorg 1.6.3 from Ubuntu Karmic koala).
Git says that the mach64 driver was deleted, along with shared-code,
2010/2/7 Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie:
This would thus narrow my investigation path to the AGP code
of the radeon driver, right?
No it narrows it down the to the AGP hardware in your machine along with
the probable lack of info on it, and maybe some tweaks that we know
nothing about.
By AGP
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Catalin Patulea c...@vv.carleton.ca wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in getting DRI working on my ATI Rage XL card under
2.6.31-14 with mach64_drv 6.8.2 (Xorg 1.6.3 from Ubuntu Karmic koala).
Git says that the mach64 driver was deleted, along with shared-code,
2010/2/7 Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com:
I've no idea about sideband addressing. Is there a way to check
whether it's enabled or not? And is there a way to disable it?
lspci -vv gives:
80:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R300 NG
[FireGL X1] (rev 80)
On 02/07/10 13:24, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Catalin Patuleac...@vv.carleton.ca wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in getting DRI working on my ATI Rage XL card under
2.6.31-14 with mach64_drv 6.8.2 (Xorg 1.6.3 from Ubuntu Karmic koala).
Git says that the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15228
--- Comment #3 from Adam Majer ad...@zombino.com 2010-02-07 19:32:59 ---
I don't think this is a regression. I've just tested X 7.5 with kernel 2.6.26,
2.6.32-rc8 and 2.6.32 with the same results. I will test if removing one of the
GPUs makes
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15245
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Starr shawn.st...@rogers.com 2010-02-07 20:04:34
---
This is reproducible with non-KMS also, -rc7 has not seen this yet. But I still
haven't stressed -rc7 enough.
--
Configure bugmail:
Except for mach64 :-) Unless I'm mistaken, that never made it into the
linux kernel.
If someone wants to add mach64 to staging it would be possible, it would
be nice if clean patches that pass checkpatch.pl could be constructed for
it.
Since I think all the security issues were resolved
On Thursday 04 February 2010, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2010.02.03 23:44:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
Hi
I found this regression on my EeePC 701 with modesetting enabled. When
I hibernate using s2disk, I can abort the
2010/2/7 Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net:
They live in the kernel.
I can't seem to find them there.. perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree;f=drivers/gpu/drm
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12646
Simon Holm Thøgersen o...@cs.aau.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
[ANNOUNCEMENT:
Maciej Rutecki has generously volunteered to work on the tracking of kernel
regressions with me, so now there are two people doing this and I'm going
to call us the tracking team. Please be friendly to Maciej, he's doing his
best to help. If you have any information about
Hi all,
I'd like to write a hwmon driver for the Radeon GPUs. I made a quick
search in the M56 and M76 register references on AMD's site but didn't
find anything. I then wrote to gpudriverdevsupp...@amd.com and now I'm
waiting for some response. In the meanwhile, has anybody of you seen
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.31 regressions introduced before
2.6.32, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.31 regressions, please let us
From: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Some servers hardcode an edid in rom so that they will
work properly with KVMs. This is a port of the relevant
code from the ddx.
[airlied: reworked to validate edid at boot stage - and
remove special quirk, if there is a valid EDID in the BIOS rom
we'll
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This is strange - like really really strange, twilight zone of strange.
VGA ports have DDC buses, but sometimes for some reasons the BIOS
says we don't and we oops.
reported on irc by nirbheek
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
---
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Émeric Maschino
emeric.masch...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/2/7 Stephane Marchesin stephane.marche...@gmail.com:
From what I recall, all the ia64 AGP chipsets (well the zx1 and the
460) have to be run:
- without side band adressing
- without fast writes
- at 4x
23 matches
Mail list logo
