Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [adaplas@pol.net: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Fwd:Re: [Dri-devel] future of DRI?]

2003-03-03 Thread Antonino Daplas
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 09:25, Alan Cox wrote: On early athlon you prefetch non cached memory and the cpu corrupts its cache, on PII, PII mmap frame buffer against a cached page, but the right kind of instruction in a loop with the instruction bridging the two memory types and run it in a tight

[Dri-devel] Re: [adaplas@pol.net: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Fwd: Re: [Dri-devel]future of DRI?]

2003-03-02 Thread Antonino Daplas
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 08:27, Alan Cox wrote: Sven, Thanks for posting this. I was actually waiting for the fbdev maintainers (Geert and James) to respond first. Seems Geert is receptive to the idea. On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 21:57, Sven Luther wrote: 1. fbdev will be secure. Without access to

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: future of DRI? - why no one plays with Glide3.

2003-03-01 Thread Antonino Daplas
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 04:05, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Smitty wrote: Yes, it is. But you missed my point. The point being that code exists and nobody is hacking on it. I'm not *blaming* anyone. Volunteers work on what volunteers are interested in working on. That's

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: future of DRI? - why no one plays with Glide3.

2003-03-01 Thread Antonino Daplas
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 07:11, Linus Torvalds wrote: On 2 Mar 2003, Antonino Daplas wrote: AFAIK, there are at least 2 versions of the i810 framebuffer driver publicly available, both of which are not possible without the public docs. I don't think that answers Mike's criticism

[Dri-devel] Re: Re: future of DRI? - why no one plays with Glide3.

2003-03-01 Thread Antonino Daplas
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 07:17, Mike A. Harris wrote: On 2 Mar 2003, Antonino Daplas wrote: I think the Intel 8x0 is also a bad example. Precisely because the XFree86 and DRI drivers are funded by Intel that volunteer work shifts to other areas (fbdev, DirectFB). Secondly, these old Intel

Re: [Dri-devel] Might interest the DRI folks (from the kernel list)

2003-02-26 Thread Antonino Daplas
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 22:26, Alan Cox wrote: I have a reproducable kernel panic with different 2.4.x kernels. I'm using XFree86-4.2.0-8 with a i810 onboard chipset. Sometimes when I log off X the kernel panics. This can be reproduced by loging in on a VC as root and typing: