On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 06:34:37AM +, Linux Kernel wrote:
This bit seems to be backing out a memleak fix..
(takedown doesn't kfree 'device' 'minor' that I can see.)
diff -Nru a/drivers/char/drm/drm_drv.h b/drivers/char/drm/drm_drv.h
--- a/drivers/char/drm/drm_drv.h Sat Mar 29
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Dave Jones wrote:
This bit seems to be backing out a memleak fix..
Well, yes and no. I looked at the code, and decided that the memleak fix
was hottibly bogus.
Look at how the allocations are done inside the loop: they are INSIDE A
LOOP.
Look at what happens with the
Dave Jones wrote:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,2)
#define down_write down
#define up_write up
#if can go, like it did in other parts of the patch.
What will replace it? If you intend to keep the two
projects in sync and easy to update, I'm afraid that it will
call for
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:14:58AM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,2)
#define down_write down
#define up_write up
#if can go, like it did in other parts of the patch.
What will replace it?
Nothing.
