On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:40:12AM +0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 08:42 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:18:40AM +0800, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:40:12AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 08:42 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:18:40AM +0800, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:41:25PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:35 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
misery ensues. This patch is based on a patch found on dri-devel by
Shaohua Li, but Keith P. expressed reticence that the changes unfairly
penalized other hardware.
(The mm/shmem.c hunk is
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on x86_64:
my 32-bit PAE machine with (slightly!) 4GB shows no ZONE_DMA32.
Does this patch perhaps depend on another, to enable DMA32 on 32-bit
PAE, or am I just in a muddle?
No,
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
misery ensues. This patch is based on a patch found on dri-devel by
Shaohua Li, but Keith P. expressed reticence that the changes
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:35 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
misery
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:18:40AM +0800, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on x86_64:
my 32-bit PAE machine with (slightly!) 4GB shows no ZONE_DMA32.
Does this patch perhaps depend on another,
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 08:42 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 08:18:40AM +0800, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm confused: I thought GFP_DMA32 only applies on x86_64:
my 32-bit PAE machine with (slightly!) 4GB shows no
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
From: Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com
Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
misery ensues. This patch is based on a patch found on dri-devel by
10 matches
Mail list logo
