Re: [r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

2006-11-17 Thread Jerome Glisse
On 11/16/06, Rune Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully working fragment.position for the r300 driver. This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact that it depends on functional changes in

Re: [r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

2006-11-17 Thread Brian Paul
Rune Petersen wrote: Hi, I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully working fragment.position for the r300 driver. This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact that it depends on functional changes in r300_vertexprog.c

Re: [r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

2006-11-17 Thread Rune Petersen
Brian Paul wrote: Rune Petersen wrote: Hi, I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully working fragment.position for the r300 driver. This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact that it depends on functional changes in r300_vertexprog.c

[r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

2006-11-16 Thread Rune Petersen
Hi, I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully working fragment.position for the r300 driver. This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact that it depends on functional changes in r300_vertexprog.c (r300_select_vertex_shader4). The patches: