RFC: xfree: dri2: libdrm as optional

2010-01-20 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Some drivers use DRI2 protocol but implement their own kernel rendering mananger. For these drivers, libdrm becomes useless. The only inconvenient right now to put libdrm optional to X server is concerning DRI2Authenticate. Such function uses drm_magic_t and drmAuthMagic symbols from libdrm. So I

Re: RFC: xfree: dri2: libdrm as optional

2010-01-20 Thread Oliver McFadden
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 20:18 +0100, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: > Some drivers use DRI2 protocol but implement their own kernel rendering > mananger. For these drivers, libdrm becomes useless. > > The only inconvenient right now to put libdrm optional to X server is > concerning DRI2Au

Re: RFC: xfree: dri2: libdrm as optional

2010-01-19 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Some drivers use DRI2 protocol but implement their own kernel rendering > mananger. For these drivers, libdrm becomes useless. Yeah, I think this could be ok. The drm usage in DRI2 does stick out a bit, and should probably be pushed to the