Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave Airlie wrote:
I'll try it out as soon as there is time.
>>> I've just tested glxgears and a few mesa tests on it and it seems to
>>> be working fine
>>>
>>> We should probably think about pulling this over
On 5/9/07, Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> I'll try it out as soon as there is time.
> >
> > I've just tested glxgears and a few mesa tests on it and it seems to
> > be working fine
> >
> > We should probably think about pulling this over into the DRM soone
...And the patch.
Thomas Hellström wrote:
Dave Airlie wrote:
I'll try it out as soon as there is time.
I've just tested glxgears and a few mesa tests on it and it seems to
be working fine
We should probably think about pulling this over into the DRM sooner
rather than later, there are al
Dave Airlie wrote:
>> I'll try it out as soon as there is time.
>
> I've just tested glxgears and a few mesa tests on it and it seems to
> be working fine
>
> We should probably think about pulling this over into the DRM sooner
> rather than later, there are also some changes to the DDX
> i830_
> I'll try it out as soon as there is time.
I've just tested glxgears and a few mesa tests on it and it seems to
be working fine
We should probably think about pulling this over into the DRM sooner
rather than later, there are also some changes to the DDX
i830_driver.c compat code to deal wit
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> I've started a cleanup branch,
>> >>
>> >> I've just checked in the mm_ioctl split out into separate parts, I'll
>> >> try and get fence and buffer done as well..
>> >>
>> >> This will break comp
On 5/7/07, Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> I've started a cleanup branch,
> >>
> >> I've just checked in the mm_ioctl split out into separate parts, I'll
> >> try and get fence and buffer done as well..
> >>
> >> This will break compatiblity but to be honest, a
Dave Airlie wrote:
>> I've started a cleanup branch,
>>
>> I've just checked in the mm_ioctl split out into separate parts, I'll
>> try and get fence and buffer done as well..
>>
>> This will break compatiblity but to be honest, anyone who has deployed
>> this beyond embedded system work (i.e. TG a
> I've started a cleanup branch,
>
> I've just checked in the mm_ioctl split out into separate parts, I'll
> try and get fence and buffer done as well..
>
> This will break compatiblity but to be honest, anyone who has deployed
> this beyond embedded system work (i.e. TG and me), deserves what they
I've started a cleanup branch,
I've just checked in the mm_ioctl split out into separate parts, I'll
try and get fence and buffer done as well..
This will break compatiblity but to be honest, anyone who has deployed
this beyond embedded system work (i.e. TG and me), deserves what they
get for int
10 matches
Mail list logo
