On 12/8/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0800, Austin Yuan wrote:
buffer. Because the interface of alloc_by_type only receives a
simple parameter type, here I hide the user space address into
type and re-get it in alloc_userspace_memory.
That should
Just an idea when thinking about the issue on
http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2005-April/007662.html.
I have done some experiment on it, and the idea here is doable, but
the method may be ugly and a little tricky.
For Intel integrated graphics chips, gart driver programs system memory
On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0800, Austin Yuan wrote:
buffer. Because the interface of alloc_by_type only receives a
simple parameter type, here I hide the user space address into
type and re-get it in alloc_userspace_memory.
That should probably be fixed by extending the API to pass both
I
Alan Cox wrote:
On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0800, Austin Yuan wrote:
buffer. Because the interface of alloc_by_type only receives a
simple parameter type, here I hide the user space address into
type and re-get it in alloc_userspace_memory.
That should probably be fixed by extending the
On 12/8/05, Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0800, Austin Yuan wrote:
buffer. Because the interface of alloc_by_type only receives a
simple parameter type, here I hide the user space address into
type and re-get it in
