fields that control this mechanism:
PRE_WRITE_TIMER and PRE_WRITE_LIMIT.
In the radeon DRM codebase I didn't found anyone using/setting
those registers. Maybe PA-RISC has some problem here?...
Thanks.
Пересылаемое сообщение
04.08.2013, 15:06, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk
Alex,
09.09.2013, в 21:43, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk wrote:
Folks,
We (people at linux-parisc @ vger.kernel.org mail list) are trying to make
native video options of the latest PA-RISC servers
pages for the gart.
You may want to look there.
Ah, sorry. Indeed. Though, my idea with:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk wrote:
Thanks! I'll try. Meanwhile i've tried a switch from page_alloc() to
dma_alloc_coherent() in radeon_dummy_page_*(), which didn't help
17.09.2013, в 18:24, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk wrote:
Alex,
10.09.2013, в 16:37, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
The dummy page isn't really going to help much. That page is just
used
17.09.2013, в 23:33, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk написал(а):
17.09.2013, в 18:24, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk wrote:
Alex,
10.09.2013, в 16:37, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
The dummy
)=0xCAFEDEAD) issue.
Signed-off-by: Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
index 2417571..413cdd1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
@@ -2933,10 +2933,11 @@ static int
21.09.2013, в 1:27, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk wrote:
17.09.2013, в 18:24, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk wrote:
Alex
20.09.2013, в 22:33, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk wrote:
Prevent NULL pointer dereference in case when radeon_ring_fini() did it's
job.
Reading of r100_cp_ring_info and radeon_ring_gfx debugfs entries
P.S.: don't run means don't allow to run, by either feeding radeon.test=X
or radeon.benchmark=1
22.09.2013, в 5:18, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk написал(а):
20.09.2013, в 22:33, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk
24.09.2013, 00:11, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 07:39:10AM +0400, Alex Ivanov wrote:
21.09.2013, в 1:27, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com написал(а):
The register writes seems to be going through the register backbone
correctly:
[0x00B] 0x15E0
Alex,
You'd want to add the add the flush to r100_ring_test() in r100.c.
radeon_cp.c is for the old UMS support.
Right!
Konrad,
Thanks for the code! I'll try asap.
25.09.2013, 21:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com:
I took a look at the arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c and I see
Let's go futher.
25.09.2013, 22:58, Alex Ivanov gnido...@p0n4ik.tk:
25.09.2013, 21:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com:
I took a look at the arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c and I see that
is mostly a flat platform. That is bus addresses == physical addresses.
Unless
01.10.2013, 18:16, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Jerome, Konrad
Forgive an ignorant question, but it appears like both Nouveau and
Radeon may use pci_map_page() when populating TTMs on
pages obtained using
don't implement DPMS at all and
at the same time have TTY switch broken.
Signed-off-by: Alex Ivanov <gnido...@ya.ru>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 41 +
i
On 11.10.2017 12:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Why exactly is the existing dpms ioctl not good enough? it's implemented
as the "DPMS" property attached to connectors, but that's the only
difference compared to your code here.
Also, that one doesn't have any XXX about atomic like yours.
I also
On 11.10.2017 13:13, Daniel Stone wrote:
I'm sorry, but this is not the right way to go about things. If Xorg
or GNOME Shell or Weston or whatever thinks the monitor is DPMS-off,
the fact that someone else has forcibly switched it back on will not
make them continue painting.
User should
16 matches
Mail list logo
