On 2018-10-08 20:09, Jordan Crouse wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:57:29PM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
The interconnect framework is designed to provide a
standard kernel interface to control the settings of
the interconnects on a SoC.
The interconnect API uses a consumer/provider-bas
On 2018-10-08 14:57, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
Since the upstream interconnect bus framework has landed
upstream, the existing references of custom bus scaling
needs to be cleaned up.
Signed-off-by: Sravanthi Kollukuduru
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c| 157
++
On 2018-10-24 22:09, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Hi Sravanthi,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:54:33PM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
The interconnect framework is designed to provide a
standard kernel interface to control the settings of
the interconnects on a SoC.
The interconnect API uses a co
On 2018-11-14 21:19, Sean Paul wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:54:32PM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
Since the upstream interconnect bus framework has landed
upstream, the existing references of custom bus scaling
needs to be cleaned up.
Just a few nits below.
Sure, will make the chan
On 2018-08-03 21:07, Sean Paul wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 04:24:44PM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
Reserve DMA pipe for cursor plane and attach it to the
crtc during the initialization.
Signed-off-by: Sravanthi Kollukuduru
Hi Sravanthi,
Thanks for sending this. I have a few comment
On 2018-03-14 20:37, Sean Paul wrote:
Ensure that pm_runtime is properly referenced/unreferenced when we need
it.
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul
---
Didn't get a response to my suggestion, so wrote the patch anyways.
Thoughts?
This patch looks fine for now.
The plan is to deprecate the downstream
On 2018-03-15 20:12, skoll...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-03-14 20:37, Sean Paul wrote:
Ensure that pm_runtime is properly referenced/unreferenced when we
need
it.
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul
Reviewed-by: Sravanthi Kollukuduru
---
Didn't get a response to my suggestion, so wrote the patch
On 2018-03-18 18:19, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:21:37AM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
Remove DT entries of hw block offsets and other target specific
catalog
information for SDM845.
That is clear from the diff. The commit msg should answer why?
Will update the commi
On 2018-03-19 19:29, Sean Paul wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:21:38AM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
This change adds the hardware catalog information in driver source
for SDM845. This removes the current logic of dt based parsing
of target catalog information.
Signed-off-by: Sravanthi
On 2018-03-20 20:47, Sean Paul wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:13:38PM +0530, skoll...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
On 2018-03-19 19:29, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:21:38AM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
> > This change adds the hardware catalog information in driver source
> >
On 2018-03-29 20:22, Sean Paul wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:59:24PM +0530, Sravanthi Kollukuduru wrote:
Currently, the downstream driver depends on the DT file for the
hardware block offsets and other target specific catalog information.
To align the driver with the upstream DT design, this
11 matches
Mail list logo
