Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: fix debugfs versus rcu and fence dumping v2
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.7, v4.14.86, v4.9.143, v4.4.166,
v3.18.128,
v4.19.7: Build OK!
v4.14.86: Build OK!
v4.9.143: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
5eb2c72c8acc ("dma-buf: fence debugging")
v4.4.166: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
5eb2c72c8acc ("dma-buf: fence debugging")
v3.18.128: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
5eb2c72c8acc ("dma-buf: fence debugging")
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: fix debugfs versus rcu and fence dumping v2
Am 06.12.18 um 17:58 schrieb Chris Wilson: > Quoting jgli...@redhat.com (2018-12-06 15:47:04) >> From: Jérôme Glisse >> >> The debugfs take reference on fence without dropping them. Also the >> rcu section are not well balance. Fix all that ... > Wouldn't the code be a lot simpler (and a consistent snapshot) if it used > reservation_object_get_fences_rcu()? Yeah, thought about that as well. Or even better move that code into reservation_object.c as reservation_object_show_fences() or something like that. Christian. > -Chris ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: fix debugfs versus rcu and fence dumping v2
Quoting jgli...@redhat.com (2018-12-06 15:47:04) > From: Jérôme Glisse > > The debugfs take reference on fence without dropping them. Also the > rcu section are not well balance. Fix all that ... Wouldn't the code be a lot simpler (and a consistent snapshot) if it used reservation_object_get_fences_rcu()? -Chris ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
