On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 14:53, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
> On 08.04.2024 12:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 11:57, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
> >>
> >> In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared
> >> to NULL,
> >> but then callback function is
On 08.04.2024 12:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 11:57, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to
NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional
On 08.04.2024 19:51, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 4/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is
compared to NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
Found
On 4/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to
NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
Found by Linux Verification Center
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 11:57, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
>
> In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to
> NULL,
> but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
> Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center