On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 12:43:07PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Monday, 9 April 2018 12:18:28 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:56:55AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday, 9 April 2018 11:53:07 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Apr
Hi Daniel,
On Monday, 9 April 2018 12:18:28 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:56:55AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday, 9 April 2018 11:53:07 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:23:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> The mode and
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:56:55AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday, 9 April 2018 11:53:07 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:23:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The mode and ajusted_mode passed to the bridge .mode_set() operation
> > > should never be
On Monday, 9 April 2018 11:53:07 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:23:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The mode and ajusted_mode passed to the bridge .mode_set() operation
> > should never be modified by the bridge (and are not in any of the
> > existing bridge
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:23:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The mode and ajusted_mode passed to the bridge .mode_set() operation
> should never be modified by the bridge (and are not in any of the
> existing bridge drivers). Make them const to make this clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent
