Jason Ekstrand writes:
> You can have a full reviewed-by
You're too kind :-)
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On June 19, 2018 22:16:37 "Keith Packard" wrote:
Jason Ekstrand writes:
I don't think I have any more comments on this patch. It's gross but I
think it should work.
I'll mark you down as 'Acked-by' then. Neither of us loves the
implementation; I'll see about creating the kernel
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> I don't think I have any more comments on this patch. It's gross but I
> think it should work.
I'll mark you down as 'Acked-by' then. Neither of us loves the
implementation; I'll see about creating the kernel infrastructure
necessary to supplant it.
--
-keith
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > I suppose we probably shouldn't worry about current_time being greater
> than
> > INT64_MAX? I guess if that happens we have pretty big problems...
>
> Nope, we've already given up on that working -- it's a
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> I suppose we probably shouldn't worry about current_time being greater than
> INT64_MAX? I guess if that happens we have pretty big problems...
Nope, we've already given up on that working -- it's a couple hundred
years of system uptime. Neither of us have any concerns
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > I still don't really like this but I agree that this code really should
> not
> > be getting hit very often so it's probably not too bad. Maybe one day
> > we'll be able to drop the non-syncobj paths entirely.
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> I still don't really like this but I agree that this code really should not
> be getting hit very often so it's probably not too bad. Maybe one day
> we'll be able to drop the non-syncobj paths entirely. Wouldn't that be
> nice.
I agree. What I want to have is
I still don't really like this but I agree that this code really should not
be getting hit very often so it's probably not too bad. Maybe one day
we'll be able to drop the non-syncobj paths entirely. Wouldn't that be
nice. In the mean time, this is probably fine. I did see one issue below
with
