On 2018-04-04 15:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> First of all, thank you for the patch. This generates more discussion than I
> had anticipated, which is both good and bad. I'll comment through the e-mail,
> and try to explain both my initial idea, and also where it could lead us.
*snip*
Thank yo
Hello,
First of all, thank you for the patch. This generates more discussion than I
had anticipated, which is both good and bad. I'll comment through the e-mail,
and try to explain both my initial idea, and also where it could lead us.
On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 16:02:31 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
On 2018-03-27 11:47, jacopo mondi wrote:
>> + * RETURNS:
>> + * The number of bus input formats the bridge accepts. Zero means that
>> + * the chain of bridges are not converting the bus format and that the
>> + * format of the drm_connector should be used.
>
> How do we get to the connector forma
Hi Jacopo,
Thanks for the feedback!
On 2018-03-27 11:47, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>thanks for the patches
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:24:44PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Bridges may affect the required bus output format of the encoder, in
>> which case it may be wrong to use the o
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 02:12:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> On 2018-03-27 11:47, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >thanks for the patches
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:24:44PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> Bridges may affect the
Hi Peter,
thanks for the patches
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:24:44PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Bridges may affect the required bus output format of the encoder, in
> which case it may be wrong to use the output format of the panel or
> connector as is. Add infrastructure to address this proble
